Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38183840›Full record

ReviewEBioMedicine2024

Glioblastoma vaccines: past, present, and opportunities.

Zujian Xiong, Itay Raphael, Michael Olin, Hideho Okada, Xuejun Li, Gary Kohanbash

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EBioMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
16.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Recent Advances in Targeted Therapies for Adult Gliomas.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Zujian XiongDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15201, USA; Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410008, PR China.
Itay RaphaelDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15201, USA.
Michael OlinDepartment of Pediatrics, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Hideho OkadaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Xuejun LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410008, PR China; Hunan International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Brain Tumor Research, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410008 PR China. Electronic address: lxjneuro@csu.edu.cn.
Gary KohanbashDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15201, USA; Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. Electronic address: gary.kohanbash@pitt.edu.
Central South University · CNUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

Preclinical development of breakthrough immunotherapy for brain tumorsR35NS105068 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI OKADA, HIDEHO · 2018 to 2025
$6.0M
NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS105068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the most lethal central nervous systems (CNS) tumours in adults. As supplements to standard of care (SOC), various immunotherapies improve the therapeutic effect in other cancers. Among them, tumour vaccines can serve as complementary monotherapy or boost the clinical efficacy with other immunotherapies, such as immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) therapy. Previous studies in GBM therapeutic vaccines have suggested that few neoantigens could be targeted in GBM due to low mutation burden, and single-peptide therapeutic vaccination had limited efficacy in tumour control as monotherapy. Combining diverse antigens, including neoantigens, tumour-associated antigens (TAAs), and pathogen-derived antigens, and optimizing vaccine design or vaccination strategy may help with clinical efficacy improvement. In this review, we discussed current GBM therapeutic vaccine platforms, evaluated and potential antigenic targets, current challenges, and perspective opportunities for efficacy improvement.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCancer VaccinesGlioblastomaAdultAntigens, NeoplasmHumansImmunotherapyImmunotherapy, AdoptiveAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesGlioblastomaTumour antigenVaccine efficacyVaccine perspectiveVaccine platform

Identifiers

PMID38183840
PMCPMC10808938
OpenAlexW4390629359

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.