Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38187622›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Interpretable Trajectory Inference with Single Cell Linear Adaptive Negative-binomial Expression (scLANE) Testing.

Jack R Leary, Xiaoru Dong, Rhonda Bacher

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jack R LearyDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Florida.ORCID 0009-0004-8821-3269
Xiaoru DongDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Florida.ORCID 0000-0003-3039-3004
Rhonda BacherDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Florida.ORCID 0000-0001-5787-476X

Funding

Resolving single-cell analysis challenges via data-driven decision frameworks and novel statistical methodsR35GM146895 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Rhonda Bacher · 2022 to 2026
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM146895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of trajectory inference methods for single-cell RNA-seq data has allowed researchers to investigate complex biological processes by examining underlying gene expression dynamics. After estimating a latent cell ordering, statistical models are used to determine which genes exhibit changes in expression that are significantly associated with progression through the biological trajectory. While a few techniques for performing trajectory differential expression exist, most rely on the flexibility of generalized additive models in order to account for the inherent nonlinearity of changes in gene expression. As such, the results can be difficult to interpret, and biological conclusions often rest on subjective visual inspections of the most dynamic genes. To address this challenge, we propose scLANE testing, which is built around an interpretable generalized linear model and handles nonlinearity with basis splines chosen empirically for each gene. In addition, extensions to estimating equations and mixed models allow for reliable trajectory testing under complex experimental designs. After validating the accuracy of scLANE under several different simulation scenarios, we apply it to a set of diverse biological datasets and display its ability to provide novel biological information when used downstream of both pseudotime and RNA velocity estimation methods. scLANE is freely available as an R package and is also accessible via a web server leveraging high performance computing resources at https://sclane.rc.ufl.edu/.

Indexed as

genomicsscRNA-seqtrajectory analysis

Identifiers

PMID38187622
PMCPMC10769309

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.