ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023
Expression of secreted frizzled-related proteins in acute aortic dissection patients and the effects on prognosis.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Secreted frizzled-related proteins in angiogenesis: molecular mechanisms and clinical implications.Angiogenesis · 2025Review
- Integrated analyses of Mendelian randomization, eQTL, and single-cell transcriptome identify CCN3 as a potential biomarker in aortic dissection.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Prognostic significance of serum secreted frizzled-related protein 5 in patients with acute aortic dissection.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Secreted frizzled-related proteins (SFRPs) were reported to be involved in cardiovascular diseases. This study aimed to observe plasma SFRP levels in acute aortic dissection (AD) patients and the effects of SFRP expression on AD prognosis. Methods: Plasma levels of SFRP1, SFRP2, SFRP3, SFRP4, and SFRP5 were measured in AD patients and non-AD (NAD) patients. The end-point events information of AD patients, including all-cause death and various clinical complications due to aortic dissection, was collected during a 36-month follow-up. Results: The SFRP1, SFRP2, SFRP3, and SFRP4 levels were increased in AD patients compared with those in NAD patients, while the SFRP5 concentrations were decreased. No differences in any of the SFRP levels were observed between the type A group and the type B group. The AD patients with end-point events exhibited higher SFRP1, SFRP2, SFRP3, and SFRP4 concentrations but lower SFRP5 levels than the patients without end-point events. In addition, the AD patients were divided into a high group and a low group based on the median SFRP levels, and Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the AD patients with high SFRP1, SFRP2, SFRP4, or SFRP5 levels had a better prognosis than those with low levels. However, the AD patients with high SFRP3 levels exhibited the opposite trends. The binary logistic regression analysis found that SFRP1, SFRP2, SFRP4, and SFRP5 were all negatively correlated with the occurrence of end-point events, while SFRP3 was positively correlated with its occurrence. Conclusions: SFRP levels are all changed in acute AD, which may affect the prognosis of AD patients. SFRPs may be a target to improve the prognosis of AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.