ReviewMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2024
Research Status and Prospect of Finger Rehabilitation Machinery.
Review in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling and Analysis of Torsional Stiffness in Rehabilitation Robot Joints Using Fractal Theory.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Design and Driving Performance Study of Soft Actuators for Hand Rehabilitation Training.Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
About 80% of stroke patients have hand motor dysfunction, and wearing finger rehabilitation machinery can enable patients to carry out efficient passive rehabilitation training independently. At present, many typical finger rehabilitation machines have been developed, and clinical experiments have confirmed the effectiveness of mechanically assisted finger rehabilitation. In this paper, the finger rehabilitation machinery will be classified in the actuation mode, and the terminal traction drive/motor drive/spring drive/rope drive/memory alloy drive/electroactive material drive/hydraulic drive/pneumatic drive technology and its typical applications are analyzed. Study the structure, control methods, overlap between mechanical bending nodes and finger joints, training modes, response speed, and driving force of various types of finger rehabilitation machinery. The advantages and disadvantages of various actuation methods of finger rehabilitation machinery are summarized. Finally, the difficulties and opportunities faced by the future development of finger rehabilitation machinery are prospected. In general, with the continuous improvement of quality of life, stroke patients need flexible, segmented control, accurate bending, multi-training mode, fast response, and good driving force finger rehabilitation machinery. This will also be a future hot research direction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.