Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38200103›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A comparison of visual and acoustic mismatch negativity as potential biomarkers in schizophrenia.

Hajnalka Molnár, Csilla Marosi, Melinda Becske, Emese Békési, Kinga Farkas, Gábor Stefanics, István Czigler, Gábor Csukly

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Oddball Evoked Deviant Responses Reflect Complex Context-Dependent Expectations in Mouse V1.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hajnalka MolnárDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Csilla MarosiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Melinda BecskeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Emese BékésiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Kinga FarkasDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Gábor StefanicsDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
István CziglerInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology, RCNS, HU-RES, Budapest, Hungary.
Gábor CsuklyDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. csukly.gabor@med.semmelweis-univ.hu.ORCID 0000-0002-3555-1692
Semmelweis University · HUInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology · HU

Funding

Hungarian Scientific Research Fund OTKA PD 115837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mismatch negativity (MMN) is an event-related potential (ERP) component generated when an unexpected deviant stimulus occurs in a pattern of standard stimuli. Several studies showed that the MMN response to both auditory and visual stimuli is attenuated in schizophrenia. While previous studies investigated auditory and visual MMN in different cohorts, here we examined the potential clinical utility of MMN responses to auditory and visual stimuli within the same group of patients. Altogether 39 patients with schizophrenia and 39 healthy controls matched in age, gender, and education were enrolled. We recorded EEG using 64 channels in eight experimental blocks where we presented auditory and visual stimulus sequences. Mismatch responses were obtained by subtracting responses to standard from the physically identical deviant stimuli. We found a significant MMN response to the acoustic stimuli in the control group, whereas no significant mismatch response was observed in the patient group. The group difference was significant for the acoustic stimuli. The 12 vane windmill pattern evoked a significant MMN response in the early time window in the control group but not in the patient group. The 6 vane windmill pattern evoked MMN only in the patient group. However, we found no significant difference between the groups. Furthermore, we found no correlation between the clinical variables and the MMN amplitudes. Our results suggest that predictive processes underlying mismatch generation in patients with schizophrenia may be more affected in the acoustic compared to the visual domain. Acoustic MMN tends to be a more promising biomarker in schizophrenia.

Indexed as

SchizophreniaAcousticsBiomarkersEducational StatusHumansRecordsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID38200103
PMCPMC10782025
OpenAlexW4390696727

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.