ReviewNutrients2024
Nutrition and Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction.
Review in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Colorectum and embedded networks of nerve fibers present auxetic responses during uniaxial circumferential extension.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Article
- Comparative Study on Burden, Features and Determinants of Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction Between Southern Europe and the Rest of Continent: Results From the Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study.United European gastroenterology journal · 2026Article
- Association Between Dyspeptic Symptoms and Eating Habits in the Colombian Population.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Disorders of gut-brain interaction are a new challenge of our increasingly complex society, with worldwide repercussions.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2025Article
- The Duodenal Microenvironment in Functional Dyspepsia.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2025Review
- Characterisation of the Plasma and Faecal Metabolomes in Participants with Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Changes in SOD and NF-κB Levels inAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The Mesentery's Pivotal Role in the Brain-Gut-Liver Axis.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDisorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBIs) have a complex pathophysiology that is often characterized by a relationship between food ingestion and triggering of symptoms. Understanding of the underlying mechanisms and the role of nutrients as a therapeutic target are rapidly evolving. AIMS AND
methodsWe performed a narrative review of the literature using the following keywords, their acronyms, and their associations: nutrients, disorders of gut-brain interaction; functional dyspepsia; malabsorption; irritable bowel syndrome; diarrhea; constipation.
resultsFunctional dyspepsia displayed a significant correlation between volume, fat and/or wheat abundance, chemical composition of ingested food and symptoms of early satiety, fullness and weight loss. Carbohydrate malabsorption is related to enzyme deficiency throughout the GI tract. Food composition and richness in soluble vs. non-soluble fibers is related to constipation and diarrhea. The elimination of fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAPs) has a significant and non-unidirectional impact on irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms.
conclusionsFood volume, nutritive and chemical composition, and its malabsorption are associated with symptom generation in DGBIs. Further multicenter, randomized-controlled clinical trials are needed to clarify the underlying pathophysiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.