Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38204166›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2024

An accurate probabilistic step finder for time-series analysis.

Alex Rojewski, Max Schweiger, Ioannis Sgouralis, Matthew Comstock, Steve Pressé

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mamba time series forecasting with uncertainty quantification.Machine learning: science and technology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alex RojewskiDepartment of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona; Center for Biological Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona.
Max SchweigerDepartment of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona; Center for Biological Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona.
Ioannis SgouralisDepartment of Mathematics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, Tennessee.
Matthew ComstockDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
Steve PresséDepartment of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona; Center for Biological Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona; School of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona. Electronic address: spresse@asu.edu.

Funding

Toward high spatiotemporal resolution models of single molecules for in vivo applicationsR35GM148237 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI Steve Presse · 2023 to 2026
$1.7M
A Bayesian nonparametric approach to superresolved tracking of multiple molecules inside living cellsR01GM130745 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI PRESSE, STEVE · 2019 to 2023
$1.5M
Theoretical Models of Single Molecule Dynamics from Minimal Photon NumbersR01GM134426 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI PRESSE, STEVE · 2019 to 2022
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM130745NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM134426NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM148237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noisy time-series data-from various experiments, including Förster resonance energy transfer, patch clamp, and force spectroscopy, among others-are commonly analyzed with either hidden Markov models or step-finding algorithms, both of which detect discrete transitions. Hidden Markov models, including their extensions to infinite state spaces, inherently assume exponential-or technically geometric-holding time distributions, biasing step locations toward steps with geometric holding times, especially in sparse and/or noisy data. In contrast, existing step-finding algorithms, while free of this restraint, often rely on ad hoc metrics to penalize steps recovered in time traces (by using various information criteria) and otherwise rely on approximate greedy algorithms to identify putative global optima. Here, instead, we devise a robust and general probabilistic (Bayesian) step-finding tool that neither relies on ad hoc metrics to penalize step numbers nor assumes geometric holding times in each state. As the number of steps themselves in a time-series are a priori unknown, we treat these within a Bayesian nonparametric (BNP) paradigm. We find that the method developed, BNP Step (BNP-Step), accurately determines the number and location of transitions between discrete states without any assumed kinetic model and learns the emission distribution characteristic of each state. In doing so, we verify that BNP-Step can analyze sparser data sets containing higher noise and more closely spaced states than otherwise resolved by current state-of-the-art methods. What is more, BNP-Step rigorously propagates measurement uncertainty into uncertainty over state transition locations, numbers, and emission levels as characterized by the posterior. We demonstrate the performance of BNP-Step on both synthetic data as well as data drawn from force spectroscopy experiments.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBayes TheoremMarkov ChainsProbabilityTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID38204166
PMCPMC11393690

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.