ArticleCurrent diabetes reviews2025
Comparing Methods for Induction of Insulin Resistance in Mouse 3T3-L1 Cells.
Article in Current diabetes reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell culture plays a crucial role in addressing fundamental research questions, particularly in studying insulin resistance (IR) mechanisms. Multiple
backgroundInsulin resistance (IR) is a cellular condition linked to metabolic disorders. Despite the utility of cell culture in IR research, questions persist regarding the suitability of various models. This study seeks to evaluate these models' efficiency in inducing IR and their ability to mimic
objective1- Investigate the technical differences between existing cell culture models used to study molecular mediators of insulin resistance (IR). 2- Compare the effectiveness of present METHODS AND MATERIAL:
resultsWe induced insulin resistance in 3T3-L1 cells using IL-6, TNFα, 4HNE, and high insulin in both hypoxic and normoxic conditions. Hypoxia increased HIF1a gene expression by approximately 30% (P<0.01). TNFα reduced cell proliferation by 10-20%, and chronic TNFα treatment significantly decreased mature adipocytes due to its cytotoxicity. We assessed the impact of insulin resistance (IR) on metabolic pathways, focusing on genes linked to branched-chain amino acid metabolism, detoxification, and chemotaxis. Notably, ALDH6A1 and MCCC1 genes, related to amino acid metabolism, were significantly affected under hypoxic conditions. TNFα treatment notably influenced MCP-1 and MCP-2 genes linked to chemotaxis, with remarkable increases in MCP-1 levels and MCP-2 expression primarily under hypoxia. Detoxification-related genes showed minimal impact, except for a significant increase in MAOA expression under acute hypoxic conditions with TNFα treatment. Additional genes displayed varying effects, warranting further investigation. To investigate insulin signaling's influence
conclusionIn summary, different
Indexed as
Identifiers
38204253What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.