Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38205036›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Proxy use of patient portals on behalf of children: Federally Qualified Health Centers as a case study.

Patrick Dang, Arlette Chavez, Cecilia Pham, Mary Tipton, LeChauncy D Woodard, Omolola E Adepoju

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Patrick DangHumana Integrated Health Systems Sciences Institute, University of Houston, Houston, USA.
Arlette ChavezHumana Integrated Health Systems Sciences Institute, University of Houston, Houston, USA.
Cecilia PhamTilman J Fertitta Family College of Medicine, University of Houston, Houston, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5172-1487
Mary TiptonHumana Integrated Health Systems Sciences Institute, University of Houston, Houston, USA.
LeChauncy D WoodardTilman J Fertitta Family College of Medicine, University of Houston, Houston, USA.
Omolola E AdepojuHumana Integrated Health Systems Sciences Institute, University of Houston, Houston, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5585-7146

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study examined the proxy use of patient portals for children in a large Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHC) network in Texas. Methods: We used de-identified individual-level data of patients, 0-18 years, who had 1+ visits between December 2018 and November 2020. Logistic regression was used to examine patient-, clinic-, and geographic-level factors associated with portal usage by an assumed proxy (i.e. parent or guardian). Results: The proxy portal usage rate increased from 28% in the pre-pandemic months (November 2018-February 2020) to 34% in the pandemic months (March-Nov 2020). Compared to patients 0-5 years, patients aged 6 to 18 years had lower odds of portal usage (6-10 OR: 0.77, Conclusion: While others have reported portal usage rates as high as 64% in pediatric settings, our analysis suggests proxy portal usage rates of 30% in pediatric FQHC settings, with race/ethnicity, age group, and chronic disease status being significant drivers of portal non-usage. These findings highlight the need for appropriate and responsive health information technology approaches for vulnerable populations receiving care in low-resource settings.

Indexed as

Federally Qualified Health Centershealth information technologypatient portalProxysafety-net

Identifiers

PMID38205036
PMCPMC10777763

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.