ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2024
Allo-targeting of the kinase domain: Insights from in silico studies and comparison with experiments.
Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational approaches to druggable site identification: Current status and future perspective.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- Leveraging artificial intelligence and machine learning in kinase inhibitor development: advances, challenges, and future prospects.RSC medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- How residence time works in allosteric drugs.Current opinion in structural biology · 2025Review
- Advancements in Protein Kinase Inhibitors: From Discovery to Clinical Applications.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
- Tilting the Scales toward EGFR Mutant Selectivity: Expanding the Scope of Bivalent "Type V" Kinase Inhibitors.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2024Article
- Global hinge sites of proteins as target sites for drug binding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The eukaryotic protein kinase domain has been a broadly explored target for drug discovery, despite limitations imposed by its high sequence conservation as a shared modular domain and the development of resistance to drugs. One way of addressing those limitations has been to target its potential allosteric sites, shortly called allo-targeting, in conjunction with, or separately from, its conserved catalytic/orthosteric site that has been widely exploited. Allosteric regulation has gained importance as an alternative to overcome the drawbacks associated with the indiscriminate effect of targeting the active site, and it turned out to be particularly useful for these highly promiscuous and broadly shared kinase domains. Yet, allo-targeting often faces challenges as the allosteric sites are not as clearly defined as its orthosteric sites, and the effect on the protein function may not be unambiguously assessed. A robust understanding of the consequence of site-specific allo-targeting on the conformational dynamics of the target protein is essential to design effective allo-targeting strategies. Recent years have seen important advances in in silico identification of druggable sites and distinguishing among them those sites expected to allosterically mediate conformational switches essential to signal transmission. The present opinion underscores the utility of such computational approaches applied to the kinase domain, with the help of comparison between computational predictions and experimental observations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.