ArticleScientific reports2024
Machine-learning model for predicting oliguria in critically ill patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of machine learning models to predict 30-day mortality in patients with cardiac arrest complicated by acute kidney injury.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based model for triage-stage prediction of emergency department disposition.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Accurate prediction of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia using machine learning in critically ill patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Veterinary Clinical Pathology-An Introduction and Review.Veterinary clinical pathology · 2025Review
- Construction and validation of risk prediction models for renal replacement therapy in patients with acute pancreatitis.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This retrospective cohort study aimed to develop and evaluate a machine-learning algorithm for predicting oliguria, a sign of acute kidney injury (AKI). To this end, electronic health record data from consecutive patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between 2010 and 2019 were used and oliguria was defined as a urine output of less than 0.5 mL/kg/h. Furthermore, a light-gradient boosting machine was used for model development. Among the 9,241 patients who participated in the study, the proportions of patients with urine output < 0.5 mL/kg/h for 6 h and with AKI during the ICU stay were 27.4% and 30.2%, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) values provided by the prediction algorithm for the onset of oliguria at 6 h and 72 h using 28 clinically relevant variables were 0.964 (a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.963-0.965) and 0.916 (a 95% CI of 0.914-0.918), respectively. The Shapley additive explanation analysis for predicting oliguria at 6 h identified urine values, severity scores, serum creatinine, oxygen partial pressure, fibrinogen/fibrin degradation products, interleukin-6, and peripheral temperature as important variables. Thus, this study demonstrates that a machine-learning algorithm can accurately predict oliguria onset in ICU patients, suggesting the importance of oliguria in the early diagnosis and optimal management of AKI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.