ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2024
Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty: stomach location and task classification for evaluation using artificial intelligence.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty: A Systematic Review of Preliminary Evidence.Obesity surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Enhancing Medical Training Through Learning From Mistakes by Interacting With an Ill-Trained Reinforcement Learning Agent.IEEE transactions on learning technologies · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe have previously developed grading metrics to objectively measure endoscopist performance in endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG). One of our primary goals is to automate the process of measuring performance. To achieve this goal, the repeated task being performed (grasping or suturing) and the location of the endoscopic suturing device in the stomach (Incisura, Anterior Wall, Greater Curvature, or Posterior Wall) need to be accurately recorded.
methodsFor this study, we populated our dataset using screenshots and video clips from experts carrying out the ESG procedure on ex vivo porcine specimens. Data augmentation was used to enlarge our dataset, and synthetic minority oversampling (SMOTE) to balance it. We performed stomach localization for parts of the stomach and task classification using deep learning for images and computer vision for videos.
resultsClassifying the stomach's location from the endoscope without SMOTE for images resulted in 89% and 84% testing and validation accuracy, respectively. For classifying the location of the stomach from the endoscope with SMOTE, the accuracies were 97% and 90% for images, while for videos, the accuracies were 99% and 98% for testing and validation, respectively. For task classification, the accuracies were 97% and 89% for images, while for videos, the accuracies were 100% for both testing and validation, respectively.
conclusionWe classified the four different stomach parts manipulated during the ESG procedure with 97% training accuracy and classified two repeated tasks with 99% training accuracy with images. We also classified the four parts of the stomach with a 99% training accuracy and two repeated tasks with a 100% training accuracy with video frames. This work will be essential in automating feedback mechanisms for learners in ESG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.