Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38214047›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine2023

Rehabilitation and COVID-19: systematic review by Cochrane Rehabilitation.

Chiara Arienti, Stefano G Lazzarini, Elisa Andrenelli, Claudio Cordani, Francesco Negrini, Elisa Pollini, Maria G Ceravolo, International Multiprofessional Steering Committee of Cochrane Rehabilitation REH-COVER Action

Open access · diamondAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Artificial intelligence in rehabilitation: a living systematic mapping review - first release.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Assessment and management of post-COVID-19 pulmonary complications: a rapid review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Chiara ArientiIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy.
Stefano G LazzariniIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy - slazzarini@dongnocchi.it.
Elisa AndrenelliDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.
Claudio CordaniDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University "La Statale", Milan, Italy.
Francesco NegriniIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Tradate, Varese, Italy.
Elisa PolliniUniversity of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Maria G CeravoloDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.
International Multiprofessional Steering Committee of Cochrane Rehabilitation REH-COVER Action
Don Carlo Gnocchi Foundation · ITMarche Polytechnic University · ITIstituto Ortopedico Galeazzi · ITUniversity of Brescia · ITUniversity of Insubria · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUntil the last update in February 2022, the Cochrane Rehabilitation COVID-19 Evidence-based Response (REH-COVER) action identified an increasing volume of evidence for the rehabilitation management of COVID-19. Therefore, our aim was to identify the best available evidence on the effectiveness of interventions for rehabilitation for COVID-19-related limitations of functioning of rehabilitation interest in adults with COVID-19 or post COVID-19 condition (PCC). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We ran the searches on February 17 EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: After duplicate removal, we identified 18,950 individual records and 53 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Our findings suggest that the effect of breathing and strengthening exercise programs on dyspnea and physical exercise capacity compared to no treatment in non-severe COVID-19 patients is uncertain. Multicomponent telerehabilitation may slightly increase physical exercise capacity compared to educational intervention in adults with PCC. There is, however, uncertainty about its effect on lung function and physical exercise capacity when compared to no treatment. Finally, the effect of inspiratory muscle training on maximal inspiratory pressure compared to no treatment in adults with PCC is uncertain.

conclusionsInterventions that are part of comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation approaches may benefit dyspnea and exercise tolerance in adults with COVID-19 and PCC. The available evidence has several methodological limitations that limit the certainty of evidence and the clinical relevance of findings. Therefore, we cannot provide robust suggestions for practice. While high-quality RCTs are being conducted, clinicians should consider using high-quality evidence from other pulmonary conditions to rehabilitate patients with COVID-19 or PCC using context-specific interventions.

Indexed as

COVID-19Chronic DiseaseDyspneaExerciseHumansPhysical Therapy Modalities

Identifiers

PMID38214047
PMCPMC10792873
OpenAlexW4390795281

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.