Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38216301›Full record

ReviewAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2024

Patient Engagement in Neuroradiology: A Narrative Review and Case Studies.

Nadja Kadom, Zofia M Lasiecka, Alexander J Nemeth, Jeffrey B Rykken, Yvonne W Lui, David Seidenwurm

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Patient experiences with brainInternational journal of bipolar disorders · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nadja KadomFrom the Emory University School of Medicine (N.K.), Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia nkadom@emory.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1591-9357
Zofia M LasieckaEmory University School of Medicine (Z.M.L.), Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0001-8638-2270
Alexander J NemethNorthwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern Memorial Hospital (A.J.N.), Chicago, Illinois.ORCID 0000-0003-0579-3866
Jeffrey B RykkenUniversity of Minnesota (M-Health) (J.B.R.), Minneapolis.ORCID 0000-0002-1958-2448
Yvonne W LuiNew York University, Grossman School of Medicine (Y.W.L.), New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-9984-9164
David SeidenwurmSutter Health (D.S.), Sacramento, California.ORCID 0000-0002-3238-6062

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of patient engagement in radiology is evolving and offers ample opportunities for neuroradiologists to become involved. The patient journey can serve as a model that inspires patient engagement initiatives. The patient journey in radiology may be viewed in 5 stages: 1) awareness that an imaging test is needed, 2) considering having a specific imaging test, 3) access to imaging, 4) imaging service delivery, and 5) ongoing care. Here, we describe patient engagement opportunities based on literature review and paired with case studies by practicing neuroradiologists.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationRadiologyHumansRadiologists

Identifiers

PMID38216301
PMCPMC11286113

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.