Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38216953›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2024

Genomic prediction for root and yield traits of barley under a water availability gradient: a case study comparing different spatial adjustments.

Biructawit B Tessema, Miguel A Raffo, Xiangyu Guo, Simon F Svane, Lene Krusell, Jens Due Jensen, Anja Karine Ruud, Marta Malinowska, Kristian Thorup-Kristensen, Just Jensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genomic prediction for yield and malting traits in barley using metabolomic and near-infrared spectra.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Biructawit B TessemaCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8830, Tjele, Denmark. bbtessema2@gmail.com.
Miguel A RaffoCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8830, Tjele, Denmark. mraffo@qgg.au.dk.
Xiangyu GuoCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8830, Tjele, Denmark.
Simon F SvaneDepartment of Plant and Environmental Science, University of Copenhagen, 1871, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Lene KrusellSejet Plant Breeding I/S, 8700, Horsens, Denmark.
Jens Due JensenNordic Seed A/S, 8300, Odder, Denmark.
Anja Karine RuudCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8830, Tjele, Denmark.
Marta MalinowskaCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8830, Tjele, Denmark.
Kristian Thorup-KristensenDepartment of Plant and Environmental Science, University of Copenhagen, 1871, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Just JensenCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8830, Tjele, Denmark.

Funding

Innovation Fund Denmark 5184-000358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn drought periods, water use efficiency depends on the capacity of roots to extract water from deep soil. A semi-field phenotyping facility (RadiMax) was used to investigate above-ground and root traits in spring barley when grown under a water availability gradient. Above-ground traits included grain yield, grain protein concentration, grain nitrogen removal, and thousand kernel weight. Root traits were obtained through digital images measuring the root length at different depths. Two nearest-neighbor adjustments (M1 and M2) to model spatial variation were used for genetic parameter estimation and genomic prediction (GP). M1 and M2 used (co)variance structures and differed in the distance function to calculate between-neighbor correlations. M2 was the most developed adjustment, as accounted by the Euclidean distance between neighbors.

resultsThe estimated heritabilities ([Formula: see text]) ranged from low to medium for root and above-ground traits. The genetic coefficient of variation ([Formula: see text]) ranged from 3.2 to 7.0% for above-ground and 4.7 to 10.4% for root traits, indicating good breeding potential for the measured traits. The highest [Formula: see text] observed for root traits revealed that significant genetic change in root development can be achieved through selection. We studied the genotype-by-water availability interaction, but no relevant interaction effects were detected. GP was assessed using leave-one-line-out (LOO) cross-validation. The predictive ability (PA) estimated as the correlation between phenotypes corrected by fixed effects and genomic estimated breeding values ranged from 0.33 to 0.49 for above-ground and 0.15 to 0.27 for root traits, and no substantial variance inflation in predicted genetic effects was observed. Significant differences in PA were observed in favor of M2.

conclusionsThe significant [Formula: see text] and the accurate prediction of breeding values for above-ground and root traits revealed that developing genetically superior barley lines with improved root systems is possible. In addition, we found significant spatial variation in the experiment, highlighting the relevance of correctly accounting for spatial effects in statistical models. In this sense, the proposed nearest-neighbor adjustments are flexible approaches in terms of assumptions that can be useful for semi-field or field experiments.

Indexed as

Genomic predictionRootsSemi-fieldSpatial adjustmentSpring barleyYield

Identifiers

PMID38216953
PMCPMC10785381

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.