Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38225925›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of nutrition2024

Towards consistency in dietary pattern scoring: standardising scoring workflows for healthy dietary patterns using 24-h recall and two variations of a food frequency questionnair.

Lizanne Arnoldy, Sarah Gauci, Annie-Claude M Lassemillante, Joris C Verster, Helen Macpherson, Anne-Marie Minihane, Andrew Scholey, Andrew Pipingas, David J White

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lizanne ArnoldyCentre for Mental Health and Brain Sciences, Swinburne University, Melbourne, VIC3122, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1277-843X
Sarah GauciCentre for Mental Health and Brain Sciences, Swinburne University, Melbourne, VIC3122, Australia.
Annie-Claude M LassemillanteDepartment of Nursing and Allied Health, Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University, Melbourne, VIC3122, Australia.
Joris C VersterCentre for Mental Health and Brain Sciences, Swinburne University, Melbourne, VIC3122, Australia.
Helen MacphersonInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VICAustralia.
Anne-Marie MinihaneDepartment of Nutrition and Preventive Medicine, Norwich Medical School, BCRE, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9042-4226
Andrew ScholeyCentre for Mental Health and Brain Sciences, Swinburne University, Melbourne, VIC3122, Australia.
Andrew PipingasCentre for Mental Health and Brain Sciences, Swinburne University, Melbourne, VIC3122, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2309-7197
David J WhiteCentre for Mental Health and Brain Sciences, Swinburne University, Melbourne, VIC3122, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthy dietary patterns such as the Mediterranean diet (MeDi), Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) and the Mediterranean-DASH Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay (MIND) have been evaluated for their potential association with health outcomes. However, the lack of standardisation in scoring methodologies can hinder reproducibility and meaningful cross-study comparisons. Here we provide a reproducible workflow for generating the MeDi, DASH and MIND dietary pattern scores from frequently used dietary assessment tools including the 24-h recall tool and two variations of FFQ. Subjective aspects of the scoring process are highlighted and have led to a recommended reporting checklist. This checklist enables standardised reporting with sufficient detail to enhance the reproducibility and comparability of their outcomes. In addition to these aims, valuable insights in the strengths and limitations of each assessment tool for scoring the MeDi, DASH and MIND diet can be utilised by researchers and clinicians to determine which dietary assessment tool best meets their needs.

Indexed as

Dietary Approaches To Stop HypertensionDiet, HealthyMental RecallDiet, MediterraneanDiet SurveysHumansReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkflowAdministered 24-H Dietary Assessment ToolDietary Approaches to Stop HypertensionFFQMediterranean-DASH Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay

Identifiers

PMID38225925
PMCPMC11043911

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.