Trial reportJAMA2024
Default Palliative Care Consultation for Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial.
Trial report in JAMA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02505035 (Default Palliative Care Consultation for Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Default Palliative Care Consultation for Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Prognostic Notifications on Inpatient Advance Care Planning: A Cluster Randomized Trial.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2025Trial
- Algorithm-Based Palliative Care in Patients With Cancer: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- Mobile App-Facilitated Collaborative Palliative Care Intervention for Critically Ill Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA internal medicine · 2025Trial
- Automated algorithms for identifying patients requiring palliative care: a systematic review and meta‑analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Designing a Clinical Decision Support Tool to Promote Timely Palliative Care in Heart Failure.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Hospital at home for older frequent hospital users: present and future of a healthcare challenge.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2026Article
- A patient-mediated implementation strategy to improve nutrition care delivery for esophageal and gastric cancer: a study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025Article
- Virtual, Nurse-Led Early Primary Palliative Care Intervention (ELICIT) for Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Digitally Enabled Discharge Quality After Neurosurgical Traumatic Brain Injury: A 10-Year Cohort from a Brazilian Public Tertiary Center.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Performance of electronic medical record tool in predicting 6-month mortality in hospitalized patients with cancer.Journal of hospital medicine · 2025Article
- Disease and Race-Based Differences in Inpatient Palliative Care Consultation in Cancer and Noncancer Serious Illnesses.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Article
- Article
- The Real-World Effect of Early Screening for Palliative Care Criteria in a Medical Intensive Care Unit: An Instrumental Variable Analysis.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2025Article
- From Screening to Outcomes: Rethinking Palliative Care Metrics in the Intensive Care Unit.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2025Article
- Hospital and Temporal Variations in Limitations of Care Among Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: A VIRUS Registry Retrospective Cohort Study.Palliative medicine reports · 2025Article
- What a Hug Does: A Qualitative Study of Chinese Immigrant Families' Experiences with Inpatient Palliative Care Specialists.Palliative medicine reports · 2025Article
- Clinicians' Use of Choice Framing in ICU Family Meetings.Critical care medicine · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Increasing inpatient palliative care delivery is prioritized, but large-scale, experimental evidence of its effectiveness is lacking. Objective: To determine whether ordering palliative care consultation by default for seriously ill hospitalized patients without requiring greater palliative care staffing increased consultations and improved outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: A pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster randomized trial was conducted among patients 65 years or older with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, or kidney failure admitted from March 21, 2016, through November 14, 2018, to 11 US hospitals. Outcome data collection ended on January 31, 2019. Intervention: Ordering palliative care consultation by default for eligible patients, while allowing clinicians to opt-out, was compared with usual care, in which clinicians could choose to order palliative care. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was hospital length of stay, with deaths coded as the longest length of stay, and secondary end points included palliative care consult rate, discharge to hospice, do-not-resuscitate orders, and in-hospital mortality. Results: Of 34 239 patients enrolled, 24 065 had lengths of stay of at least 72 hours and were included in the primary analytic sample (10 313 in the default order group and 13 752 in the usual care group; 13 338 [55.4%] women; mean age, 77.9 years). A higher percentage of patients in the default order group received palliative care consultation than in the standard care group (43.9% vs 16.6%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.17 [95% CI, 4.59-5.81]) and received consultation earlier (mean [SD] of 3.4 [2.6] days after admission vs 4.6 [4.8] days; P < .001). Length of stay did not differ between the default order and usual care groups (percent difference in median length of stay, -0.53% [95% CI, -3.51% to 2.53%]). Patients in the default order group had higher rates of do-not-resuscitate orders at discharge (aOR, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.21-1.63]) and discharge to hospice (aOR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.07-1.57]) than the usual care group, and similar in-hospital mortality (4.7% vs 4.2%; aOR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.68-1.08]). Conclusions and Relevance: Default palliative care consult orders did not reduce length of stay for older, hospitalized patients with advanced chronic illnesses, but did improve the rate and timing of consultation and some end-of-life care processes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02505035.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.