Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38233103›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2024

Pragmatic targets for moderate/severe SLE and their implications for clinical care and trial design: sustained DORIS or LLDAS for at least 6 months is sufficient while their attainment for at least 24 months ensures high specificity for damage-free progression.

Sofia Pitsigavdaki, Myrto Nikoloudaki, Panagiotis Garantziotis, Ettore Silvagni, Argyro Repa, Antonio Marangoni, Irini Flouri, Nestor Avgoustidis, Konstantinos Parperis, Antonis Fanouriakis and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sofia PitsigavdakiRheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Crete School of Medicine, Heraklion, Greece.
Myrto NikoloudakiRheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Crete School of Medicine, Heraklion, Greece.
Panagiotis GarantziotisLaboratory of Autoimmunity and Inflammation, Centre of Clinical, Experimental Surgery and Translational Research, Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Ettore SilvagniRheumatology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara and Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S.Anna, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7654-8222
Argyro RepaRheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Crete School of Medicine, Heraklion, Greece.
Antonio MarangoniRheumatology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara and Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S.Anna, Ferrara, Italy.
Irini FlouriRheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Crete School of Medicine, Heraklion, Greece.
Nestor AvgoustidisRheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Crete School of Medicine, Heraklion, Greece.
Konstantinos ParperisDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Cyprus Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Antonis FanouriakisRheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, Joint Rheumatology Program, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2696-031X
Marcello GovoniRheumatology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara and Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S.Anna, Ferrara, Italy.
Prodromos SidiropoulosRheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Crete School of Medicine, Heraklion, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9607-0326
Dimitrios T BoumpasLaboratory of Autoimmunity and Inflammation, Centre of Clinical, Experimental Surgery and Translational Research, Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9812-4671
Alessandra BortoluzziRheumatology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara and Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S.Anna, Ferrara, Italy.
George BertsiasRheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Crete School of Medicine, Heraklion, Greece gbertsias@uoc.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5299-1406

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTreatment targets in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have been validated in unselected-in terms of severity-cohorts, which limits their generalisability. We assessed remission (Definition of Remission in SLE (DORIS)) and Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) in a historical cohort of 348 patients with active moderate-to-severe disease and median follow-up of 5 years.

methodsActive SLE was defined as Physician Global Assessment ≥1.5 and/or SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 ≥6, requiring therapy intensification. DORIS/LLDAS, organ damage, flares and adverse events were monitored. Shared frailty survival, generalised linear models and K-means clustering were applied.

resultsSustained DORIS and LLDAS for ≥6 months occurred in 41.1% and 80.4%, respectively, and resulted in reduced damage accrual (HR: 0.58; 95% CI 0.36 to 0.93 and 0.61; 0.43 to 0.86) and severe flares (HR: 0.14; 0.08 to 0.27 and 0.19; 0.13 to 0.27). LLDAS without DORIS was also protective (HR: 0.65; 0.43 to 0.98 for damage, 0.49; 0.36 to 0.67 for flares). Models fitting increasing duration of targets showed that DORIS ≥50% and LLDAS ≥60% of time, or alternatively, ≥24 and ≥36 months, achieved optimal balance between feasibility (20.2-41.7%) and specificity (73.3-86.1%) for damage-free outcome. These targets were linked to reduced serious adverse events (risk ratio (RR): 0.56-0.71), hospitalisation (RR: 0.70) and mortality (RR: 0.06-0.13). Patients with predominant arthritis and mucocutaneous disease experienced reduced DORIS/LLDAS, compared with counterparts with major organ involvement. Conventional drugs were more frequently used in the former group, whereas potent immunosuppressive/biological agents in the latter.

conclusionsIn moderate-to-severe SLE, sustained DORIS/LLDAS for at least 6 months is sufficient, while attainment for at least 24 months ensures higher specificity for damage-free progression, thus facilitating treat-to-target strategies and clinical trials. Arthritis and skin disease represent unmet therapeutic needs that could benefit from novel biologics.

Indexed as

ArthritisLupus Erythematosus, SystemicSkin DiseasesClinical Trials as TopicHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsRemission InductionSeverity of Illness IndexImmunosuppressive AgentsLupus Erythematosus, SystemicOutcome Assessment, Health CareTherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID38233103
PMCPMC10958283

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.