Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38237403›Full record

SynthesisNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2024

Brain stimulation targets for chronic pain: Insights from meta-analysis, functional connectivity and literature review.

Qiao Kong, Tingting Li, Sveta Reddy, Sierra Hodges, Jian Kong

Open access · hybridAbstract readReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qiao KongDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Tingting LiDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Sveta ReddyDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Sierra HodgesDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Jian KongDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA. Electronic address: JKONG2@mgh.harvard.edu.
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Modulation effects of Baduanjin mind-body exercise on subjective cognitive declineR01AG063975 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KONG, JIAN · 2019 to 2023
$4.0M
Modulation effects of imagined acupuncture and no touch placebo acupunctureR33AT009310 · NCCIH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KONG, JIAN · 2018 to 2021
$2.7M
Enhancing acupuncture treatment effect through non-invasive neuromodulationR33AT009341 · NCCIH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KONG, JIAN · 2019 to 2021
$2.5M
Spatiotemporal Alterations of Thalamocortical Circuitry Functioning Underlie PainR01NS129059 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI JIAN KONG, Wen Li · 2023 to 2026
$2.4M
Treatment of chronic low back pain with transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulationR34DA046635 · NIDA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KONG, JIAN · 2019 to 2021
$766k
NCCIH NIH HHS R33 AT009310NCCIH NIH HHS R33 AT009341NIA NIH HHS R01 AG063975NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA046635NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS129059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques have demonstrated their potential for chronic pain management, yet their efficacy exhibits variability across studies. Refining stimulation targets and exploring additional targets offer a possible solution to this challenge. This study aimed to identify potential brain surface targets for NIBS in treating chronic pain disorders by integrating literature review, neuroimaging meta-analysis, and functional connectivity analysis on 90 chronic low back pain patients. Our results showed that the primary motor cortex (M1) (C3/C4, 10-20 EEG system) and prefrontal cortex (F3/F4/Fz) were the most used brain stimulation targets for chronic pain treatment according to the literature review. The bilateral precentral gyrus (M1), supplementary motor area, Rolandic operculum, and temporoparietal junction, were all identified as common potential NIBS targets through both a meta-analysis sourced from Neurosynth and functional connectivity analysis. This study presents a comprehensive summary of the current literature and refines the existing NIBS targets through a combination of imaging meta-analysis and functional connectivity analysis for chronic pain conditions. The derived coordinates (with integration of the international electroencephalography (EEG) 10/20 electrode placement system) within the above brain regions may further facilitate the localization of these targets for NIBS application. Our findings may have the potential to expand NIBS target selection beyond current clinical trials and improve chronic pain treatment.

Indexed as

Chronic PainDeep Brain StimulationBrainChronic DiseaseHumansPain ManagementTranscranial Magnetic StimulationChronic painFunctional magnetic resonance imagingNeuroimagingNeuromodulationNon-invasive brain stimulation

Identifiers

PMID38237403
PMCPMC10903102
OpenAlexW4389902881

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.