Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38239496›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2024

Update of the risk assessment of inorganic arsenic in food.

EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM), Dieter Schrenk, Margherita Bignami, Laurent Bodin, James Kevin Chipman, Jesús Del Mazo, Bettina Grasl-Kraupp, Christer Hogstrand, Laurentius Ron Hoogenboom, Jean-Charles Leblanc and 18 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Safety evaluation of blue galdieria extract as a food additive.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM)
Dieter Schrenk
Margherita Bignami
Laurent Bodin
James Kevin Chipman
Jesús Del Mazo
Bettina Grasl-Kraupp
Christer Hogstrand
Laurentius Ron Hoogenboom
Jean-Charles Leblanc
Carlo Stefano Nebbia
Elsa Nielsen
Evangelia Ntzani
Annette Petersen
Salomon Sand
Christiane Vleminckx
Heather Wallace
Lars Barregård
Diane Benford
Karin Broberg
Eugenia Dogliotti
Tony Fletcher
Lars Rylander
José Cortiñas Abrahantes
Jose Ángel Gómez Ruiz
Hans Steinkellner
Tuuli Tauriainen
Tanja Schwerdtle

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The European Commission asked EFSA to update its 2009 risk assessment on arsenic in food carrying out a hazard assessment of inorganic arsenic (iAs) and using the revised exposure assessment issued by EFSA in 2021. Epidemiological studies show that the chronic intake of iAs via diet and/or drinking water is associated with increased risk of several adverse outcomes including cancers of the skin, bladder and lung. The CONTAM Panel used the benchmark dose lower confidence limit based on a benchmark response (BMR) of 5% (relative increase of the background incidence after adjustment for confounders, BMDL

Indexed as

benchmark dose (BMD)epidemiological studiesinorganic arsenic (iAs)margin of exposure (MOE)risk assessment

Identifiers

PMID38239496
PMCPMC10794945

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.