ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2024
Defining quality indicators, pharmaceutical care bundles and outcomes of clinical pharmacy service delivery using a Delphi consensus approach.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical pharmacy key performance indicators for hospital inpatient setting: a systematic review.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2024Pooled it
- Construction of clinical evaluation index system for first-line ICIs in HER-2-negative advanced gastric cancer using Delphi-AHP.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Impact of a pharmacist-led elective caesarean section pre-admission clinic on efficiency of pharmacist workflow and patient preparedness for post-operative discharge medication supply: a retrospective observational study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Observational
- The Spectrum of Clinical Pharmacy Services in a Non-University Hospital-A Comprehensive Characterization Including a Risk Assessment for Drug-Related Problems and Adverse Drug Reactions.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A post-discharge pharmacist clinic to reduce hospital readmissions: a retrospective cohort study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
- Elements of healthcare delivery required to facilitate the clinical governance of hospital pharmacy services: a document review.Health research policy and systems · 2025Review
- Article
- Exploring the suitability of a ward-based clinical pharmacy activity collection tool for ambulatory care practice: a mixed-methods study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
- Selection of outcome measurement instruments for a core outcome set for trials aimed at improving appropriate polypharmacy in older people in primary care: a Delphi consensus study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2024Article
- Measuring the impact of pharmaceutical care bundle delivery on patient outcomes: an observational study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2024Observational
- Optimizing Telehealth: Leveraging Key Performance Indicators for Enhanced TeleHealth and Digital Healthcare Outcomes (Telemechron Study).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Key performance indicators for pharmaceutical services: A systematic review.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024Review
- Benchmarking hospital clinical pharmacy practice using standardised key performance indicators (KPIs).Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClinical pharmacy quality indicators are often non-uniform and measure individual activities not linked to outcomes.
aimTo define a consensus agreed pharmaceutical care bundle and patient outcome measures across an entire state health service.
methodA four-round modified-Delphi approach with state Directors of Pharmacy was performed (n = 25). They were asked to rate on a 5-point Likert scale the relevance and measurability of 32 inpatient clinical pharmacy quality indicators and outcome measures. They also ranked clinical pharmacy activities in order from perceived most to least beneficial. Based upon these results, pharmaceutical care bundles consisting of multiple clinical pharmacy activities were formed, and relevance and measurability assessed.
resultsResponse rate ranged from 40 to 60%. Twenty-six individual clinical pharmacy quality indicators reached consensus. The top ranked clinical pharmacy quality indicator was 'proportion of patients where a pharmacist documents an accurate list of medicines during admission'. There were nine pharmaceutical care bundles formed consisting between 3 and 7 activities. Only one pharmaceutical care bundle reached consensus: medication history, adverse drug reaction/allergy documentation, admission and discharge medication reconciliation, medication review, provision of medicines education and provision of a medication list on discharge. Sixteen outcome measures reached consensus. The top ranked were hospital acquired complications, readmission due to medication misadventure and unplanned readmission within 10 days.
conclusionConsensus has been reached on one pharmaceutical care bundle and sixteen outcomes to monitor clinical pharmacy service delivery. The next step is to measure the extent of pharmaceutical care bundle delivery and the link to patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.