Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38244995›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024

A messaging standard for environmental inspections: is it time?

Clifford S Mitchell, Tim Callahan, Eamon Flynn

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Clifford S MitchellEnvironmental Health Bureau, Prevention and Health Promotion Administration, Maryland Department of Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Tim CallahanEnvironmental Health Section, Georgia Department of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Eamon FlynnEnvironmental Health Bureau, Prevention and Health Promotion Administration, Maryland Department of Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Funding

Maryland Occupational Health and Safety Surveillance ProjectU60OH011154 · OH · MARYLAND STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH · PI MITCHELL, CLIFFORD S · 2016 to 2025
$2.1M
CDC HHSCDC HHS 5NUE1EH001355NCEH CDC HHS UE2 EH001355NIOSH CDC HHS U60 OH011154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental health (EH) services in the United States lag behind other areas of public health and health care with respect to information system interoperability and data sharing. This is partly due to an absence of well-defined use cases, the lack of direct economic drivers and resources to improve, the multiple jurisdictional elements that govern EH services across the United States, and no central organization to drive modernization of EH data. We summarize the status of EH information systems; argue for greater interoperability, including use cases for a messaging standard for environmental inspections; and present recommendations to better align EH services and data modernization efforts currently underway in other areas of public health.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CarePublic HealthEnvironmental HealthHealth FacilitiesInformation SystemsUnited Statesdata standardsenvironmental healthinspectionsmessagingpublic health informatics

Identifiers

PMID38244995
PMCPMC10990543

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.