Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38245002›Full record

ReviewDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2024

Analysis and review of techniques and tools based on machine learning and deep learning for prediction of lysine malonylation sites in protein sequences.

Shahin Ramazi, Seyed Amir Hossein Tabatabaei, Elham Khalili, Amirhossein Golshan Nia, Kiomars Motarjem

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Seyed Amir Hossein TabatabaeiDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, University of Guilan, Namjoo St. Postal, Rasht 41938-33697, Iran.
Elham KhaliliDepartment of Plant Sciences, Faculty of Science, Tarbiat Modares University, Jalal AleAhmad, Tehran 14117-13116, Iran.
Amirhossein Golshan NiaDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Amirkabir University of Technology, No. 350, Hafez Ave, Tehran 15916-34311, Iran.
Kiomars MotarjemDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Jalal AleAhmad, Tehran 14117-13116, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The post-translational modifications occur as crucial molecular regulatory mechanisms utilized to regulate diverse cellular processes. Malonylation of proteins, a reversible post-translational modification of lysine/k residues, is linked to a variety of biological functions, such as cellular regulation and pathogenesis. This modification plays a crucial role in metabolic pathways, mitochondrial functions, fatty acid oxidation and other life processes. However, accurately identifying malonylation sites is crucial to understand the molecular mechanism of malonylation, and the experimental identification can be a challenging and costly task. Recently, approaches based on machine learning (ML) have been suggested to address this issue. It has been demonstrated that these procedures improve accuracy while lowering costs and time constraints. However, these approaches also have specific shortcomings, including inappropriate feature extraction out of protein sequences, high-dimensional features and inefficient underlying classifiers. As a result, there is an urgent need for effective predictors and calculation methods. In this study, we provide a comprehensive analysis and review of existing prediction models, tools and benchmark datasets for predicting malonylation sites in protein sequences followed by a comparison study. The review consists of the specifications of benchmark datasets, explanation of features and encoding methods, descriptions of the predictions approaches and their embedding ML or deep learning models and the description and comparison of the existing tools in this domain. To evaluate and compare the prediction capability of the tools, a new bunch of data has been extracted based on the most updated database and the tools have been assessed based on the extracted data. Finally, a hybrid architecture consisting of several classifiers including classical ML models and a deep learning model has been proposed to ensemble the prediction results. This approach demonstrates the better performance in comparison with all prediction tools included in this study (the source codes of the models presented in this manuscript are available in https://github.com/Malonylation). Database URL: https://github.com/A-Golshan/Malonylation.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLysineMachine LearningProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProteinsLysineProteins

Identifiers

PMID38245002
PMCPMC10799748

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.