ReviewFrontiers in neuroinformatics2023
The past, present and future of neuroscience data sharing: a perspective on the state of practices and infrastructure for FAIR.
Review in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reconciling global collaboration and data sovereignty in neuroscience.Nature neuroscience · 2026Review
- Accelerating the development of bioelectronic medicine: outcomes and innovations from the NIH SPARC initiative.Bioelectronic medicine · 2026Review
- Siibra: a software tool suite for realizing a Multilevel Human Brain Atlas from complex data resources.Nature methods · 2026Article
- EthoPy provides an accessible platform for reproducible behavioral neuroscience.Cell reports methods · 2026Article
- Sharing EHR data of patients with rare diseases for research - The role of quality assessments in a national federated research data infrastructure.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- A multimodal spatial atlas of transcriptomic, morphological, and electrophysiological cell type densities in the mouse brain.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- NeuroFAIR curator: an AI-assisted framework for metadata enrichment, quality screening, curation prioritization, and FAIR readiness of brain tumor MRI data.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2026Article
- Use as directed? A comparison of software tools intended to check rigor and transparency of published work.PloS one · 2026Article
- Pennsieve: A Collaborative Platform for Translational Neuroscience and Beyond.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Chemoarchitectural studies of the rat hypothalamus and zona incerta.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- NeuroConv: Streamlining Neurophysiology Data Conversion to the NWB Standard.Proceedings of the Python in Science Conferences. Python in Science Conference · 2025Article
- A Community Effort to Develop Common Data Elements for Pre-Clinical Spinal Cord Injury Research.Neurotrauma reports · 2025Review
- Moving beyond diagnostic labels in psychiatry: outcome-linked treatment modelling.General psychiatry · 2025Article
- Interdisciplinary and Collaborative Training in Neuroscience: Insights from the Human Brain Project Education Programme.Neuroinformatics · 2024Article
- Editorial: Protecting privacy in neuroimaging analysis: balancing data sharing and privacy preservation.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Neuroscience has made significant strides over the past decade in moving from a largely closed science characterized by anemic data sharing, to a largely open science where the amount of publicly available neuroscience data has increased dramatically. While this increase is driven in significant part by large prospective data sharing studies, we are starting to see increased sharing in the long tail of neuroscience data, driven no doubt by journal requirements and funder mandates. Concomitant with this shift to open is the increasing support of the FAIR data principles by neuroscience practices and infrastructure. FAIR is particularly critical for neuroscience with its multiplicity of data types, scales and model systems and the infrastructure that serves them. As envisioned from the early days of neuroinformatics, neuroscience is currently served by a globally distributed ecosystem of neuroscience-centric data repositories, largely specialized around data types. To make neuroscience data findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable requires the coordination across different stakeholders, including the researchers who produce the data, data repositories who make it available, the aggregators and indexers who field search engines across the data, and community organizations who help to coordinate efforts and develop the community standards critical to FAIR. The International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility has led efforts to move neuroscience toward FAIR, fielding several resources to help researchers and repositories achieve FAIR. In this perspective, I provide an overview of the components and practices required to achieve FAIR in neuroscience and provide thoughts on the past, present and future of FAIR infrastructure for neuroscience, from the laboratory to the search engine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.