Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38250019›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroinformatics2023

The past, present and future of neuroscience data sharing: a perspective on the state of practices and infrastructure for FAIR.

Maryann E Martone

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Chemoarchitectural studies of the rat hypothalamus and zona incerta.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. NeuroConv: Streamlining Neurophysiology Data Conversion to the NWB Standard.Proceedings of the Python in Science Conferences. Python in Science Conference · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Maryann E MartoneDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, CA, United States.

Funding

K-CORE: Curation and Knowledge Management for SPARCOT2OD030541 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DE BONO, BERNARD, MARTONE, MARYANN E · 2020 to 2024
$10.3M
A Community Resource for Single Cell Data in the BrainU24MH130919 · NIMH · ALLEN INSTITUTE · PI Michael Hawrylycz, Carol Lynn Thompson · 2022 to 2026
$9.9M
NIH HHS OT2 OD030541NIMH NIH HHS U24 MH130919
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroscience has made significant strides over the past decade in moving from a largely closed science characterized by anemic data sharing, to a largely open science where the amount of publicly available neuroscience data has increased dramatically. While this increase is driven in significant part by large prospective data sharing studies, we are starting to see increased sharing in the long tail of neuroscience data, driven no doubt by journal requirements and funder mandates. Concomitant with this shift to open is the increasing support of the FAIR data principles by neuroscience practices and infrastructure. FAIR is particularly critical for neuroscience with its multiplicity of data types, scales and model systems and the infrastructure that serves them. As envisioned from the early days of neuroinformatics, neuroscience is currently served by a globally distributed ecosystem of neuroscience-centric data repositories, largely specialized around data types. To make neuroscience data findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable requires the coordination across different stakeholders, including the researchers who produce the data, data repositories who make it available, the aggregators and indexers who field search engines across the data, and community organizations who help to coordinate efforts and develop the community standards critical to FAIR. The International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility has led efforts to move neuroscience toward FAIR, fielding several resources to help researchers and repositories achieve FAIR. In this perspective, I provide an overview of the components and practices required to achieve FAIR in neuroscience and provide thoughts on the past, present and future of FAIR infrastructure for neuroscience, from the laboratory to the search engine.

Indexed as

data basesdata managementdata sharingFAIR (findable accessible interoperable and reusable) principlesincfneuroinformatics

Identifiers

PMID38250019
PMCPMC10796549

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.