ReviewFrontiers in plant science2023
Deep learning for medicinal plant species classification and recognition: a systematic review.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep fused explainable neural architecture for the automatic recognition of therapeutic medicinal plants.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2026Article
- The Evolution of Phytochemical and Medicinal Plant Research in Chile: Status, Opportunities, and Challenges.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Revolutionizing drug discovery from natural products: The roles of artificial intelligence and multi-omics in accelerating innovation.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Article
- Hybrid CNN-GNN architectures with distributed training for heathland plant classification.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2026Article
- CNN-Based Classification ofBiosensors · 2026Article
- Remote Sensing Applications in Medicinal Plant Monitoring and Quality Assessment: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Lightweight vision transformer and ResNet-9 models for real-time plant disease detection and pest classification with SHAP explainability.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- FloraMediX: AI-enabled recognition and therapeutic profiling analysis of indian medicinal flora.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- CISCS: Classification of inter-class similarity based medicinal plant species groups with machine learning.MethodsX · 2025Article
- Gap Analysis of Priority Medicinal Plant Species in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based classification of traditional Chinese medicine: a novel approach.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Enhanced classification of medicinal plants using deep learning and optimized CNN architectures.Heliyon · 2025Article
- Assessing the climate change impact onFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- AI-powered recognition of Chinese medicinal herbs with semantic structure modeling and gradient-guided enhancement.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- The Millennia-Long Development of Drugs Associated with the 80-Year-Old Artificial Intelligence Story: The Therapeutic Big Bang?Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Knowledge of medicinal plant species is necessary to preserve medicinal plants and safeguard biodiversity. The classification and identification of these plants by botanist experts are complex and time-consuming activities. This systematic review's main objective is to systematically assess the prior research efforts on the applications and usage of deep learning approaches in classifying and recognizing medicinal plant species. Our objective was to pinpoint systematic reviews following the PRISMA guidelines related to the classification and recognition of medicinal plant species through the utilization of deep learning techniques. This review encompassed studies published between January 2018 and December 2022. Initially, we identified 1644 studies through title, keyword, and abstract screening. After applying our eligibility criteria, we selected 31 studies for a thorough and critical review. The main findings of this reviews are (1) the selected studies were carried out in 16 different countries, and India leads in paper contributions with 29%, followed by Indonesia and Sri Lanka. (2) A private dataset has been used in 67.7% of the studies subjected to image augmentation and preprocessing techniques. (3) In 96.7% of the studies, researchers have employed plant leaf organs, with 74% of them utilizing leaf shapes for the classification and recognition of medicinal plant species. (4) Transfer learning with the pre-trained model was used in 83.8% of the studies as a future extraction technique. (5) Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is used by 64.5% of the paper as a deep learning classifier. (6) The lack of a globally available and public dataset need for medicinal plants indigenous to a specific country and the trustworthiness of the deep learning approach for the classification and recognition of medicinal plants is an observable research gap in this literature review. Therefore, further investigations and collaboration between different stakeholders are required to fulfilling the aforementioned research gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.