ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Wearable Sensors as a Preoperative Assessment Tool: A Review.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploiting Unsupervised Free-Living Data for Cardiorespiratory Fitness Estimation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence-enabled clinical decision support systems in preadmission testing: a scoping review of risk prediction, triage, and perioperative workflows (2020-2025).Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Article
- [Orthopaedics of the future : AI meets motion analysis: opportunities and risks].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Wearable Devices in Healthcare Beyond the One-Size-Fits All Paradigm.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Wearable Technology in Surgery: New Developments Toward Real-Time Patient Monitoring.ANZ journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Respiratory Depression in Non-Operating Room Anesthesia: An Overview.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A PPG Signal Dataset Collected in Semi-Naturalistic Settings Using Galaxy Watch.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Physiological Sensors Equipped in Wearable Devices for Management of Long COVID Persisting Symptoms: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Mobile Accelerometer Applications in Core Muscle Rehabilitation and Pre-Operative Assessment.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- [The potential of wearable technology in knee arthroplasty].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Predicting Blood Glucose Levels with Organic Neuromorphic Micro-Networks.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Article
- Recent Progress in Wearable Near-Sensor and In-Sensor Intelligent Perception Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Missing Data Statistics Provide Causal Insights into Data Loss in Diabetes Health Monitoring by Wearable Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Multicenter Evaluation of Machine-Learning Continuous Pulse Rate Algorithm on Wrist-Worn Device.Digital biomarkersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Surgery is a common first-line treatment for many types of disease, including cancer. Mortality rates after general elective surgery have seen significant decreases whilst postoperative complications remain a frequent occurrence. Preoperative assessment tools are used to support patient risk stratification but do not always provide a precise and accessible assessment. Wearable sensors (WS) provide an accessible alternative that offers continuous monitoring in a non-clinical setting. They have shown consistent uptake across the perioperative period but there has been no review of WS as a preoperative assessment tool. This paper reviews the developments in WS research that have application to the preoperative period. Accelerometers were consistently employed as sensors in research and were frequently combined with photoplethysmography or electrocardiography sensors. Pre-processing methods were discussed and missing data was a common theme; this was dealt with in several ways, commonly by employing an extraction threshold or using imputation techniques. Research rarely processed raw data; commercial devices that employ internal proprietary algorithms with pre-calculated heart rate and step count were most commonly employed limiting further feature extraction. A range of machine learning models were used to predict outcomes including support vector machines, random forests and regression models. No individual model clearly outperformed others. Deep learning proved successful for predicting exercise testing outcomes but only within large sample-size studies. This review outlines the challenges of WS and provides recommendations for future research to develop WS as a viable preoperative assessment tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.