Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38259591›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2024

Risk of Death and Cardiovascular Events Following an Exacerbation of COPD: The EXACOS-CV US Study.

Kimberly Daniels, Stephan Lanes, Arlene Tave, Michael F Pollack, David M Mannino, Gerard Criner, Amanda Neikirk, Kirsty Rhodes, Norbert Feigler, Clementine Nordon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Proactive Strategies for Mitigating Cardiopulmonary Risk in COPD.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025
    Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kimberly DanielsSafety and Epidemiology, Carelon Research, Wilmington, DE, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1862-5634
Stephan LanesSafety and Epidemiology, Carelon Research, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Arlene TaveSafety and Epidemiology, Carelon Research, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Michael F PollackGlobal Medical Affairs, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7351-3059
David M ManninoCollege of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Gerard CrinerThoracic Medicine and Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Amanda NeikirkSafety and Epidemiology, Carelon Research, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Kirsty RhodesBioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Norbert FeiglerGlobal Medical Affairs, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Clementine NordonBioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBAstraZeneca (United States) · USTemple University · USUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study estimated the magnitude and duration of risk of cardiovascular events and mortality following acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), and whether risks varied by number and severity of exacerbation in a commercially insured population in the United States. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of newly diagnosed COPD patients ≥40 years old in the Healthcare Integrated Research Database from 2012 to 2019. Patients experiencing exacerbations comprised the "exacerbation cohort". Moderate exacerbations were outpatient visits with contemporaneous antibiotic or glucocorticoid administration; severe exacerbations were emergency department visits or hospitalizations for AECOPD. Follow-up started on the exacerbation date. Distribution of time between diagnosis and first exacerbation was used to assign index dates to the "unexposed" cohort. Cox proportional hazards models estimated risks of a cardiovascular event or death following an exacerbation adjusted for medical and prescription history and stratified by follow-up time, type of cardiovascular event, exacerbation severity, and rank of exacerbation (first, second, or third). Results: Among 435,925 patients, 170,236 experienced ≥1 exacerbation. Risk of death was increased for 2 years following an exacerbation and was highest during the first 30 days (any exacerbation hazard ratio (HR)=1.79, 95% CI=1.58-2.04; moderate HR=1.22, 95% CI=1.04-1.43; severe HR=5.09, 95% CI=4.30-6.03). Risks of cardiovascular events were increased for 1 year following an AECOPD and highest in the first 30-days (any exacerbation HR=1.34, 95% CI=1.23-1.46; moderate HR=1.23 (95% CI 1.12-1.35); severe HR=1.93 (95% CI=1.67-2.22)). Each subsequent AECOPD was associated with incrementally higher rates of both death and cardiovascular events. Conclusion: Risk of death and cardiovascular events was greatest in the first 30 days and rose with subsequent exacerbations. Risks were elevated for 1-2 years following moderate and severe exacerbations, highlighting a sustained increased cardiopulmonary risk associated with exacerbations.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCluster AnalysisHumansRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agentscardiac eventscardiopulmonaryCOPDepidemiologylongitudinal studies

Identifiers

PMID38259591
PMCPMC10802125
OpenAlexW4391144753

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.