Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38264716›Full record

ArticlePatterns (New York, N.Y.)2024

Enhancing phenotype recognition in clinical notes using large language models: PhenoBCBERT and PhenoGPT.

Jingye Yang, Cong Liu, Wendy Deng, Da Wu, Chunhua Weng, Yunyun Zhou, Kai Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. PhenoSS: phenotype semantic similarity-based approach for rare disease prediction and patient clustering.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Do LLMs Surpass Encoders for Biomedical NER?Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2025
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jingye YangRaymond G. Perelman Center for Cellular and Molecular Therapeutics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Cong LiuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Wendy DengRaymond G. Perelman Center for Cellular and Molecular Therapeutics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Da WuRaymond G. Perelman Center for Cellular and Molecular Therapeutics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Chunhua WengDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Yunyun ZhouRaymond G. Perelman Center for Cellular and Molecular Therapeutics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Kai WangRaymond G. Perelman Center for Cellular and Molecular Therapeutics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

Funding

The Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center (IDDRC) at CHOP/PennP50HD105354 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI ERIC D MARSH, ROBERT Thomas SCHULTZ · 2021 to 2026
$9.2M
RESCUE: Rare Disease Detection and Escalation Support via a Learning Health SystemR01HG012655 · NHGRI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Cong Liu · 2022 to 2026
$4.1M
Fair Phenotype Annotation and Genomic ReinterpretationR01HG013031 · NHGRI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Wendy K Chung, CHUNHUA WENG · 2023 to 2026
$3.5M
Deep phenotyping in Electronic Health Records for Genomic MedicineR01LM012895 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WANG, KAI, WENG, CHUNHUA · 2018 to 2021
$3.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG012655NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG013031NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD105354NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To enhance phenotype recognition in clinical notes of genetic diseases, we developed two models-PhenoBCBERT and PhenoGPT-for expanding the vocabularies of Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) terms. While HPO offers a standardized vocabulary for phenotypes, existing tools often fail to capture the full scope of phenotypes due to limitations from traditional heuristic or rule-based approaches. Our models leverage large language models to automate the detection of phenotype terms, including those not in the current HPO. We compare these models with PhenoTagger, another HPO recognition tool, and found that our models identify a wider range of phenotype concepts, including previously uncharacterized ones. Our models also show strong performance in case studies on biomedical literature. We evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of BERT- and GPT-based models in aspects such as architecture and accuracy. Overall, our models enhance automated phenotype detection from clinical texts, improving downstream analyses on human diseases.

Indexed as

BERTclinical noteselectronic health recordsGPTHuman Phenotype Ontologynamed entity recognitiontransformer

Identifiers

PMID38264716
PMCPMC10801236

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.