Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38265177›Full record

ArticleACR open rheumatology2024

Combined Orbital and Cranial Vessel Wall Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Assessment of Disease Activity in Giant Cell Arteritis.

Rennie L Rhee, Ryan Rebello, Madhura A Tamhankar, Shubhasree Banerjee, Fang Liu, Quy Cao, Robert Kurtz, Joshua F Baker, Zhaoyang Fan, Vatsal Bhatt and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intracranial GCA: a comprehensive systematic review.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rennie L RheeUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4907-0304
Ryan RebelloSt Joseph's Hospital and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Madhura A TamhankarUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Shubhasree BanerjeeUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0903-1949
Fang LiuUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Quy CaoUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Robert KurtzUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Joshua F BakerUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Zhaoyang FanUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Vatsal BhattUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Naomi AmudalaUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Sherry ChouUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Rui LiangUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Marisa SanchezUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Morgan BurkeUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Lisa DesiderioUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Laurie A LoevnerUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Jeffrey S MorrisUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Peter A MerkelUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9284-7345
Jae W SongUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
University of Pennsylvania · USSt. Joseph Hospital · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Nasal Microbiome and Host Immunity in Granulomatosis with PolyangiitisK23AR071514 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI RHEE, RENNIE · 2017 to 2022
$957k
NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR071514NIAMS NIH HHS K23AR071514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAcute visual impairment is the most feared complication of giant cell arteritis (GCA) but is challenging to predict. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluates orbital pathology not visualized by an ophthalmologic examination. This study combined orbital and cranial vessel wall MRI to assess both orbital and cranial disease activity in patients with GCA, including patients without visual symptoms.

methodsPatients with suspected active GCA who underwent orbital and cranial vessel wall MRI were included. In 14 patients, repeat imaging over 12 months assessed sensitivity to change. Clinical diagnosis of ocular or nonocular GCA was determined by a rheumatologist and/or ophthalmologist. A radiologist masked to clinical data scored MRI enhancement of structures.

resultsSixty-four patients with suspected GCA were included: 25 (39%) received a clinical diagnosis of GCA, including 12 (19%) with ocular GCA. Orbital MRI enhancement was observed in 83% of patients with ocular GCA, 38% of patients with nonocular GCA, and 5% of patients with non-GCA. MRI had strong diagnostic performance for both any GCA and ocular GCA. Combining MRI with a funduscopic examination reached 100% sensitivity for ocular GCA. MRI enhancement significantly decreased after treatment (P < 0.01).

conclusionIn GCA, MRI is a sensitive tool that comprehensively evaluates multiple cranial structures, including the orbits, which are the most concerning site of pathology. Orbital enhancement in patients without visual symptoms suggests that MRI may detect at-risk subclinical ocular disease in GCA. MRI scores decreased following treatment, suggesting scores reflect inflammation. Future studies are needed to determine if MRI can identify patients at low risk for blindness who may receive less glucocorticoid therapy.

Identifiers

PMID38265177
PMCPMC11016572
OpenAlexW4391169773

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.