ArticleThe journal of nutrition, health & aging2024
Identification of molecular mediators of renal sarcopenia risk: a mendelian randomization analysis.
Article in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis and mendelian randomization analysis of serum phosphorus, albumin, and CRP as risk factors for death in hemodialysis patients.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObservational studies have shown an association between reduced renal function and the risk of sarcopenia. However, the causal relationship and the underlying biological mechanisms remain uncertain. Using a Mendelian randomization (MR) framework, we investigated the causal role of 27 hypothetical risk mediators, including metabolites, hormones, inflammation, and stress traits, on the risk of sarcopenia.
methodsInstrumental variables (IVs) to proxy renal function were identified by selecting single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) reliably associated with creatinine and cystatin C-based glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in CKDGen summary data. IVs for putative risk traits and sarcopenia traits were constructed from relevant genome-wide association studies (GWAS). MR estimated effects were obtained using an inverse-variance weighted effects model, and various sensitivity analyses were performed. The mediating role of hypothetical risk factors in the relationship between GFR and sarcopenia was assessed through multivariate MR.
resultsGenetically predicted reduced GFRcrea was associated with higher odds of appendicular lean mass (ALM) (odds ratio (OR): 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37 to 0.68) and grip strength (OR: 0.67; 95% CI 0.58 to 0.78). Likewise, GFRcys highlighted a causal relationship with ALM (OR: 0.52; 95% CI 0.42 to 0.65) and grip strength (OR: 0.66; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.74). Both estimated GFR (eGFR) were negatively associated with IGF-1, IL-16, 25(OH)D, triglycerides (range of effect size per standard deviation: -0.81 to -0.30), and positively correlated with HDL cholesterol (0.62, 0.31). There was a positive correlation between IGF-1, fasting insulin and ALM as well as grip strength (OR range: 1.04-1.67) and a negative correlation between serum CRP and ALM (OR: 0.95) as well as grip strength (OR: 0.98). Additionally, genetically predicted IL-1β (OR: 0.95) and total cholesterol (OR: 0.96) were negatively associated with ALM. We found evidence that IGF-1 mediates the relationship between eGFR and risk for muscle mass and strength.
conclusionsThis MR study provides insight into the potential causal mechanisms between renal function and the risk of sarcopenia and proposes IGF-1 as a potential target for the prevention of renal sarcopenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.