Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38268643›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2023

Low-level Laser Therapy to Alleviate Pain of Local Anesthesia Injection in Children: A Randomized Control Trial.

Bisma Saher Khan, Jyothsna V Setty, Ila Srinivasan, Sabahath Kibriya, S Anu, Sreeraksha Radhakrishna, Yuthi Milit

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bisma Saher KhanDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, M R Ambedkar Dental College & Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1941-5401
Jyothsna V SettyDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, M R Ambedkar Dental College & Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Ila SrinivasanDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, M R Ambedkar Dental College & Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Sabahath KibriyaDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, M R Ambedkar Dental College & Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7764-9789
S AnuDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, M R Ambedkar Dental College & Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3761-2636
Sreeraksha RadhakrishnaDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, M R Ambedkar Dental College & Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Yuthi MilitDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, M R Ambedkar Dental College & Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Mathrusri Ramabai Ambedkar Dental College & Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: The aim of our study was to evaluate and compare pain perception following photobiomodulation (PBM), topical anesthesia, precooling of the injection site, and vibration during administration of local anesthesia injection in pediatric patients aged 6-13 years. Materials and methods: In this split-mouth study, a total of 120 patients between the age group of 6 and 13 years were selected and randomly divided into three equal groups with 40 subjects in each. Pain was assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) and the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale after the administration of local anesthesia. Behavior during the procedure was assessed using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale filled by the operator. Pulse rate was recorded before and during the administration of local anesthesia using pulse oximeter. After the procedure, patient compliance was also recorded using validated questionnaire. The level of significance was set at Results: The study showed PBM exhibited the lowest mean scores of anxiety/pain using VAS, Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale, FLACC scale and pulse rate as compared to precooling, vibration, and topical anesthesia. The differences in pain scores recorded were found to be statistically significant. Children were not anxious about the PBM method and exhibited good compliance ( Conclusion: Photobiomodulation (PBM) was found to be effective means of reducing injection pain, demonstrating much better efficacy than other tested methods. Clinical significance: Photobiomodulation (PBM) can be used effectively to better manage procedures that patients frequently find painful without the need for prescription drugs, which frequently have several side effects. How to cite this article: Khan BS, Setty JV, Srinivasan I,

Indexed as

InjectionLocal anesthesiaLow-level laser therapyPainPhotobiomodulation

Identifiers

PMID38268643
PMCPMC10804298
OpenAlexW4390742697

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.