Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38272811›Full record

SynthesisInternational wound journal2024

Risk predictions of surgical wound complications based on a machine learning algorithm: A systematic review.

Hui Zhang, Junde Zhao, Ramyar Farzan, Hamidreza Alizadeh Otaghvar

RetractedOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International wound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hui ZhangThe Second Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Junde ZhaoDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Health Science Center, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Ramyar FarzanDepartment of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7347-6574
Hamidreza Alizadeh OtaghvarAssociate Professor of Plastic Surgery, Trauma and Injury Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8535-3881
Guilan University of Medical Sciences · IRIran University of Medical Sciences · IRLanzhou University · CNLanzhou University Second Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical wounds may arise due to harm inflicted upon soft tissue during surgical intervention, and many complications and injuries may accompany them. These complications can lead to prolonged hospitalization and poorer clinical outcomes. Also, Machine learning (ML) is a Section of artificial intelligence (AI) that has emerged in medical care and is increasingly used for diagnosis, complications, prognosis and recurrence prediction. This study aims to investigate surgical wound risk predictions and management using a ML algorithm by R programming language analysis. The systematic review, following PRISMA guidelines, spanned electronic databases using search terms like 'machine learning', 'surgical' and 'wound'. Inclusion criteria covered experimental studies from 1990 to the present on ML's application in surgical wound evaluation. Exclusion criteria included studies lacking full text, focusing on ML in all surgeries, neglecting wound assessment and duplications. Two authors rigorously assessed titles, abstracts and full texts, excluding reviews and guidelines. Ultimately, relevant articles were then analysed. The present study identified nine articles employing ML for surgical wound management. The analysis encompassed various surgical procedures, including Cardiothoracic, Caesarean total abdominal colectomy, Burn plastic surgery, facial plastic surgery, laparotomy, minimal invasive surgery, hernia repair and unspecified surgeries. ML was skillful in evaluating surgical site infections (SSI) in seven studies, while two extended its use to burn-grade diagnosis and wound classification. Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) were the most utilized algorithms. ANN achieved a 96% accuracy in facial plastic surgery wound management. CNN demonstrated commendable accuracies in various surgeries, and SVM exhibited high accuracy in multiple surgeries and burn plastic surgery. In sum, these findings underscore ML's potential for significant improvements in postoperative management and the development of enhanced care techniques, particularly in surgical wound management.

Indexed as

BurnsSurgical WoundArtificial IntelligenceHumansMachine LearningSurgical Wound Infectionmachine learningsurgical woundsystematic reviewwoundswounds healing

Identifiers

PMID38272811
PMCPMC10805538
OpenAlexW4391127198

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.