SynthesisInternational wound journal2024
Risk predictions of surgical wound complications based on a machine learning algorithm: A systematic review.
Synthesis in International wound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk predictions of surgical wound complications based on a machine learning algorithm: A systematic review.International wound journal · 2024Pooled it
- Deep learning Algorithm for Wound assessment after total kNee (DAWN) arthroplasty : a prospective study protocol.Bone & joint open · 2026Article
- Review
- Machine-learning-based prediction of functional recovery in deep-pain-negative dogs after decompressive thoracolumbar hemilaminectomy for acute intervertebral disc extrusion.Veterinary surgery : VS · 2025Article
- RETRACTION: Risk Predictions of Surgical Wound Complications Based on a Machine Learning Algorithm: A Systematic Review.International wound journal · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a preoperative systemic inflammation-based nomogram for predicting surgical site infection in patients with colorectal cancer.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence in plastic surgery, where do we stand?JPRAS open · 2024Review
- A Compass for North Carolina Health Care Workers Navigating the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence.North Carolina medical journal · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-03-03Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Objections by Author(s) ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical wounds may arise due to harm inflicted upon soft tissue during surgical intervention, and many complications and injuries may accompany them. These complications can lead to prolonged hospitalization and poorer clinical outcomes. Also, Machine learning (ML) is a Section of artificial intelligence (AI) that has emerged in medical care and is increasingly used for diagnosis, complications, prognosis and recurrence prediction. This study aims to investigate surgical wound risk predictions and management using a ML algorithm by R programming language analysis. The systematic review, following PRISMA guidelines, spanned electronic databases using search terms like 'machine learning', 'surgical' and 'wound'. Inclusion criteria covered experimental studies from 1990 to the present on ML's application in surgical wound evaluation. Exclusion criteria included studies lacking full text, focusing on ML in all surgeries, neglecting wound assessment and duplications. Two authors rigorously assessed titles, abstracts and full texts, excluding reviews and guidelines. Ultimately, relevant articles were then analysed. The present study identified nine articles employing ML for surgical wound management. The analysis encompassed various surgical procedures, including Cardiothoracic, Caesarean total abdominal colectomy, Burn plastic surgery, facial plastic surgery, laparotomy, minimal invasive surgery, hernia repair and unspecified surgeries. ML was skillful in evaluating surgical site infections (SSI) in seven studies, while two extended its use to burn-grade diagnosis and wound classification. Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) were the most utilized algorithms. ANN achieved a 96% accuracy in facial plastic surgery wound management. CNN demonstrated commendable accuracies in various surgeries, and SVM exhibited high accuracy in multiple surgeries and burn plastic surgery. In sum, these findings underscore ML's potential for significant improvements in postoperative management and the development of enhanced care techniques, particularly in surgical wound management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.