Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38273233›Full record

Trial reportBMC complementary medicine and therapies2024

Effect of acupressure on pain intensity and physiological indices in patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized double-blind sham-controlled clinical trial.

Ali Safdari, Salman Khazaei, Mahdi Biglarkhani, Seyed Habibollah Mousavibahar, Seyed Reza Borzou

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06622850 (Effect of Acupressure on Pain, Anxiety and Hemodynamic Variables in Patients Undergoing Urodynamics), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06622850 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Acupressure on Pain, Anxiety and Hemodynamic Variables in Patients Undergoing Urodynamics: A Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorTarsus UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled68ConditionsAnxiety, Pain, Acupressure, UrodynamicsArmsAcupressure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ali SafdariStudent Research Committee, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5319-5185
Salman KhazaeiDepartment of Epidemiology, Research Center for Health Sciences, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5918-2310
Mahdi BiglarkhaniDepartment of Persian Medicine, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3697-0749
Seyed Habibollah MousavibaharUrology & Nephrology Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1382-8777
Seyed Reza BorzouDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Chronic Diseases (Home Care) Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran. sr.borzu@umsha.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7689-9150
Hamedan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the widespread use of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) as a treatment for kidney stones, it is essential to apply methods to control pain and improve patient comfort during this procedure. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of acupressure at the Qiu point on pain intensity and physiological indices in patients undergoing ESWL.

methodsThis randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial was conducted at the Shahid Beheshti Educational-medical Center in Hamadan City (western Iran) from May to August 2023. Seventy-four eligible patients were split into intervention (n = 37) and sham (n = 37) groups. Ten minutes before lithotripsy, the intervention group received acupressure at the Qiu point, while the sham group received touch at a neutral point. The primary outcomes were pain intensity measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and physiological indices such as blood pressure and heart rate at baseline, 1, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 min after the intervention. The secondary outcomes included lithotripsy success and satisfaction with acupressure application.

resultsThe analysis of 70 patients showed no significant differences in the demographic and clinical information of the patients across the two groups before the study (P > 0.05). Generalized estimating equations revealed that the interaction effects of time and group in pain and heart rate were significant at 30 and 40 min (P < 0.05). The results of this analysis for systolic blood pressure revealed a significant interaction at 30 min (P = 0.035). However, no significant interaction effects were found for diastolic blood pressure changes (P > 0.05).

conclusionsAcupressure at the Qiu point positively impacts pain in patients undergoing ESWL treatment and increases their satisfaction. However, these results for physiological indices require further studies. Thus, acupressure can be considered a simple, easy, and effective option for pain management in patients during this procedure.

trial registration[ https://en.irct.ir/trial/69117 ], identifier [IRCT20190524043687N4].

Indexed as

AcupressureLithotripsyHumansPainPain ManagementPain MeasurementAcupressureComplementary therapyLithotripsyPainPhysiological indicesRenal stones

Identifiers

PMID38273233
PMCPMC10809617
OpenAlexW4391226418

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.