ArticleBiomicrofluidics2024
Machine learning classification of cellular states based on the impedance features derived from microfluidic single-cell impedance flow cytometry.
Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mitosis is a crucial biological process where a parental cell undergoes precisely controlled functional phases and divides into two daughter cells. Some drugs can inhibit cell mitosis, for instance, the anti-cancer drugs interacting with the tumor cell proliferation and leading to mitosis arrest at a specific phase or cell death eventually. Combining machine learning with microfluidic impedance flow cytometry (IFC) offers a concise way for label-free and high-throughput classification of drug-treated cells at single-cell level. IFC-based single-cell analysis generates a large amount of data related to the cell electrophysiology parameters, and machine learning helps establish correlations between these data and specific cell states. This work demonstrates the application of machine learning for cell state classification, including the binary differentiations between the G1/S and apoptosis states and between the G2/M and apoptosis states, as well as the classification of three subpopulations comprising a subgroup insensitive to the drug beyond the two drug-induced states of G2/M arrest and apoptosis. The impedance amplitudes and phases used as input features for the model training were extracted from the IFC-measured datasets for the drug-treated tumor cells. The deep neural network (DNN) model was exploited here with the structure (e.g., hidden layer number and neuron number in each layer) optimized for each given cell type and drug. For the H1650 cells, we obtained an accuracy of 78.51% for classification between the G1/S and apoptosis states and 82.55% for the G2/M and apoptosis states. For HeLa cells, we achieved a high accuracy of 96.94% for classification between the G2/M and apoptosis states, both of which were induced by taxol treatment. Even higher accuracy approaching 100% was achieved for the vinblastine-treated HeLa cells for the differentiation between the viable and non-viable states, and between the G2/M and apoptosis states. We also demonstrate the capability of the DNN model for high-accuracy classification of the three subpopulations in a complete cell sample treated by taxol or vinblastine.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.