Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38274941›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Should Patients Be Confident in Their Efficacy in Improving Their Functional Abilities After a Stroke?

Heltty Heltty, Cholik Harun Rosjidi, Lisnawati Lisnawati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Heltty HelttyMedical Surgical Nursing, Universitas Mandala Waluya, Kendari, IDN.
Cholik Harun RosjidiMedical Surgical Nursing, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Karya Kesehatan, Kendari, IDN.
Lisnawati LisnawatiCommunity Nursing, Universitas Mandala Waluya, Kendari, IDN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Patients' self-confidence in their abilities needs to be improved to achieve functional abilities after a stroke. Self-efficacy is a prerequisite for self-management after a stroke. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between self-efficacy and the functional abilities of post-stroke patients. Methodology This was an analytical cross-sectional study conducted over two months. A total of 145 respondents were recruited using the convenience sampling method. Respondents were post-stroke patients who had undergone the post-stroke phase during the first three to six months since the acute stroke. Data collection was performed through questionnaire interviews. Data were analyzed using descriptive analysis and Spearman correlation. Results There was a significant positive relationship between self-efficacy and functional independence (p < 0.05). Conclusions Self-efficacy influences motivation to perform activities of daily living, which can increase the achievement of functional abilities.

Indexed as

confidentcross-sectional studiesfunctional abilityself-efficacystroke

Identifiers

PMID38274941
PMCPMC10809299

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.