Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38276307›Full record

ArticleMetabolites2024

Analysis of the Fecal Metabolomic Profile in Breast vs. Different Formula Milk Feeding in Late Preterm Infants.

Giuseppe De Bernardo, Gilda D'Urso, Simona Spadarella, Maurizio Giordano, Giuseppina Leone, Agostino Casapullo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolites, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Giuseppe De BernardoDivision of Pediatrics Neonatology and NICU, Ospedale Buon Consiglio Fatebenefratelli, 80123 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5348-6743
Gilda D'UrsoDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, 84084 Fisciano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4407-2781
Simona SpadarellaDivision of Pediatrics Neonatology and NICU, Ospedale Buon Consiglio Fatebenefratelli, 80123 Naples, Italy.
Maurizio GiordanoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8568-4242
Giuseppina LeoneDivision of Pediatrics Neonatology and NICU, Ospedale Buon Consiglio Fatebenefratelli, 80123 Naples, Italy.
Agostino CasapulloDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, 84084 Fisciano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2310-9426

Funding

University of Salerno FARB 2021-ORSA215145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human milk is the gold standard for infant nutrition, but when it is not available or insufficient to satisfy the needs of the infant, formula milk is proposed as an effective substitute. A prospective observational cohort study was conducted on late preterm infants fed with breast and two different formula milks. On this basis, they were divided into three groups: group FMPB (fed with formula + postbiotic), group FM (fed with standard formula), and group BM (breastfed). Stool samples for a metabolomic study were collected at T0 (5-7 days after birth), T1 (30 days of life), and T2 (90 days of life), giving rise to 74 samples analyzed via liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry. The T0, T1, and T2 LC-MS raw data were processed for Partial Least Square Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA), followed by a statistical analysis. This preliminary study highlighted a good overlapping between the fecal metabolome of breast and substitute feeding systems, confirming the efficacy of the formula preparations as breast milk substitutes. Moreover, several similarities were also detected between the FMPB and BM metabolome, highlighting that the addition of a postbiotic to standard formula milk could be more effective and considered a better alternative to breast milk.

Indexed as

breast milkLactobacillus paracaseimass spectrometry-based metabolomicsmultivariate data analysisneonatal nutritionnewbornpostbiotic enrichment

Identifiers

PMID38276307
PMCPMC10820811

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.