ArticleJournal of community genetics2024
Attitudes of medical professionals toward fragile X carrier screening and genetic counseling in China.
Article in Journal of community genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhanced accuracy and sensitivity in detecting FMR1 CGG repeats: a multicenter evaluation of a novel PCR-capillary electrophoresis assay.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2025Article
- Prevalence and implications of fragile X premutation screening in Thailand.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Fragile X syndrome is the most common inherited cause of intellectual disability. Considering China's low prevalence, distinct healthcare system, middle-income economic status, and unique culture, China cannot simply replicate the screening systems in European and American countries. In this study, we investigated the attitudes of 450 Chinese medical professionals who received fragile X training on fragile X carrier screening and genetic counseling. Before the training, 57.6% of the respondents were unfamiliar with FXS. After the training, 7.3% of participants are unable to fully master the knowledge. Furthermore, 71.8% believe that the absence of phenotypes during the reproductive age and the availability of simple and feasible testing methods are prerequisites for screening. The presence of the phenotype would still require screening. Regarding the target population, over 90% of the participants support fragile X carrier screening in high-risk pregnant women. As for influencing factors, they consider cost as the most influential factor in pregnant women's decision to undergo screening. The acceptable price range for screening is determined to be ¥200-1000 ($30-150). In terms of the issues and challenges of screening, most medical professionals support the need for genetic counseling for intermediate alleles and 55-60 repeat premutation results. Additionally, some respondents believe that informing patients' family members of positive screening results is necessary. It is also recognized that positive results may lead to anxiety for patients. The findings of this study will provide valuable information for the establishment of fragile X carrier screening system, particularly for low-prevalence or middle-income countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.