Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38279083›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2024

Prevalence and associated factors of self-medication in worldwide pregnant women: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Afaf Bouqoufi, Lahlou Laila, Said Boujraf, Fatima Ait El Hadj, Rachid Razine, Redouane Abouqal, Youssef Khabbal

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Afaf BouqoufiLaboratory of Health and Science, Therapeutic Innovation, Translational Research, and Epidemiology. Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ibn Zohr University, Agadir, Morocco.
Lahlou LailaLaboratory of Health and Science, Therapeutic Innovation, Translational Research, and Epidemiology. Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ibn Zohr University, Agadir, Morocco.
Said BoujrafClinical Neurosciences Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fez, Morocco. sboujraf@gmail.com.
Fatima Ait El HadjLaboratory of Health and Science, Therapeutic Innovation, Translational Research, and Epidemiology. Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ibn Zohr University, Agadir, Morocco.
Rachid RazineLaboraoty of Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University Mohamed V, Rabat, Morocco.
Redouane AbouqalLaboraoty of Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University Mohamed V, Rabat, Morocco.
Youssef KhabbalLaboratory of Health and Science, Therapeutic Innovation, Translational Research, and Epidemiology. Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ibn Zohr University, Agadir, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-medication during pregnancy is of great interest. The use of drugs during pregnancy requires a careful reflection on the benefits to the mother and the risks to the fetus. Selecting a drug or drugs for treating pregnant women can be difficult for clinicians owing to the various pharmacokinetic and physiological changes encountered during pregnancy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of self-medication and associated factors among women during pregnancy.

methodsSearches were carried out at PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The quality of the studies and the risk of bias were analyzed using the Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies instrument. The extracted data were tabulated and analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively through meta-analysis.

resultsThe overall prevalence of self-medication among pregnant women was 44.50% (95% CI: 38.92-50.23). Subgroup analyses showed differences in self-medication prevalence influenced by region, county income, and study design. The Heterogeneity, assessed by the statistical test I2 varied from 96 to 99% and was statistically significant. The result of this funnel plot showed that the funnel plot was symmetry with p-value = 0.36, and there is no publication bias.

conclusionThe results obtained from this study showed that the prevalence of self-medication among pregnant women is relatively high. This requires effective measures and interventions to reduce self-medication.

trial registrationID =  CRD42022312333 .

Indexed as

PregnancySelf MedicationCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGeographyHumansPregnant PeoplePrevalenceSocioeconomic FactorsMeta-analysisPregnancyPregnant womenPublic HealthSelf-medicationWomen’s Health

Identifiers

PMID38279083
PMCPMC10821266

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.