Evidence mapPaperPMID 38281156Full record

ArticleTrauma, violence & abuse2024

Interprofessional Education in Child Protection for Preservice Health and Allied Health Professionals: A Scoping Review.

Lauren Elizabeth Lines, Tracy Alexis Kakyo, Helen McLaren, Megan Cooper, Nina Sivertsen, Alison Hutton, Lana Zannettino, Rebecca Starrs, Donna Hartz, Shannon Brown and 1 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma, violence & abuse, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lauren Elizabeth LinesCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2603-6960
Tracy Alexis KakyoCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Helen McLarenCollege of Education, Psychology, and Social Work, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1959-8319
Megan CooperCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Nina SivertsenCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Alison HuttonSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Lana ZannettinoCollege of Education, Psychology, and Social Work, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Rebecca StarrsCollege of Education, Psychology, and Social Work, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Donna HartzSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University (Parramatta & South) and Western Sydney Local Health District, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Shannon BrownCollege and Research Services, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Julian GrantFaculty of Science and Health, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health and allied health professionals are uniquely positioned to collaborate in prevention, early intervention and responses to child maltreatment. Effective collaboration requires comprehensive interprofessional education (IPE), and inadequate collaboration across sectors and professions continually contributes to poor outcomes for children. Little is known about what interprofessional preparation health and allied health professionals receive before initial qualification (preservice) that equips them for interprofessional collaboration and provision of culturally safe care in child protection. This scoping review aimed to identify what is known internationally about IPE in child protection for preservice health and allied health professionals. Thirteen manuscripts reporting 12 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the synthesis. Key characteristics of the educational interventions are presented, including target disciplines, core content and their learning objectives and activities. Findings demonstrated primarily low-quality methodologies and educational interventions that had not been replicated beyond their initial context. Many educational interventions did not provide comprehensive content covering the spectrum of prevention, early intervention and responses for all types of child maltreatment, and/or did not clearly indicate how IPE was achieved. Key challenges to delivering comprehensive interprofessional child protection include lack of institutional support and competing priorities across disciplines who must meet requirements of separate regulatory bodies. Consequently, there is a need for further development and robust evaluation of educational interventions to explore how interprofessional collaborative skills for child protection can be developed and delivered in preservice health and allied health professional education.

Indexed as

Allied Health PersonnelChild AbuseInterprofessional RelationsChildChild Protective ServicesCooperative BehaviorHealth PersonnelHumansInterprofessional Educationallied health professionalchild protectionhealth professionalinterprofessional educationscoping review

Identifiers

PMID38281156
PMCPMC11370204

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.