ArticleACS omega2024
Experimental and Molecular Dynamics Simulation Insights into Adsorption of Co(II), Cr(III), and Cu(II) on Chitosan and Chitosan/Tripolyphosphate Nanoparticles.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Graphene Oxide-Chitosan Composite for Efficient Adsorptive Removal of Cu(II), Co(II), and Ni(II) from Simulated E‑Waste Effluents.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Computer-Assisted Strategies as a Tool for Designing Green Monomer-Based Molecularly Imprinted Materials.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chitosan (CS)/tripolyphosphate (TPP) nanoparticles were synthesized using the ionic gelation method based on the mass ratio and volume ratio between CS and TPP and then subsequently characterized using XRD, FT-IR, and SEM. The interaction between the metal ions Co(II), Cr(III), and Cu(II) on CS and 2CS/TPP was simulated using molecular dynamics (MD), and the findings were compared with the experimental data. CS/TPP nanoparticles were more favorable than using pure chitosan at a % removal efficiency of 91.47, 89.11, and 78.11 for Cu(II), Cr(III), and Co(II), respectively. The binding energy between 2CS/TPP and the metals was more favorable than that for CS at -214.95, -106.87, and -58.11 kcal/mol for Cr(III), Co(II), and Cu(II), respectively. The CS/TPP nanoparticles greatly affect metal adsorption and are therefore considered materials for wastewater treatment.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.