Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38287349›Full record

Trial reportBMC medicine2024

Impact of preconception and antenatal supplementation with myo-inositol, probiotics, and micronutrients on offspring BMI and weight gain over the first 2 years.

Jaz Lyons-Reid, José G B Derraik, Timothy Kenealy, Benjamin B Albert, J Manuel Ramos Nieves, Cathriona R Monnard, Phil Titcombe, Heidi Nield, Sheila J Barton, Sarah El-Heis and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02509988 (Nutritional Intervention Preconception and During Pregnancy to Maintain Healthy Glucose Metabolism and Offspring Health "), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02509988 nacompletednot on this map

Nutritional Intervention Preconception and During Pregnancy to Maintain Healthy Glucose Metabolism and Offspring Health "(NiPPeR)"

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of SouthamptonRan2015 to 2022Enrolled1,729ConditionsHyperglycemiaArmsStudy nutritional drink, Standard nutritional drink
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Jaz Lyons-ReidLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.
José G B DerraikLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.
Timothy KenealyLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.
Benjamin B AlbertLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.
J Manuel Ramos NievesNestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Nestlé Research, Société Des Produits Nestlé S.A, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Cathriona R MonnardNestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Nestlé Research, Société Des Produits Nestlé S.A, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Phil TitcombeMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Heidi NieldMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Sheila J BartonMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Sarah El-HeisMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Elizabeth ThamSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Keith M Godfrey *MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Shiao-Yng Chan *Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Wayne S Cutfield *Liggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand. w.cutfield@auckland.ac.nz.
NiPPeR Study Group
University of Auckland · NZMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit · GBAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGNestlé (Switzerland) · CHUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBNational University of Singapore · SGUppsala University · SE

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/15/17/3174Medical Research Council MC_PC_21003Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNutritional intervention preconception and throughout pregnancy has been proposed as an approach to promoting healthy postnatal weight gain in the offspring but few randomised trials have examined this.

methodsMeasurements of weight and length were obtained at multiple time points from birth to 2 years among 576 offspring of women randomised to receive preconception and antenatally either a supplement containing myo-inositol, probiotics, and additional micronutrients (intervention) or a standard micronutrient supplement (control). We examined the influence on age- and sex-standardised BMI at 2 years (WHO standards, adjusting for study site, sex, maternal parity, smoking and pre-pregnancy BMI, and gestational age), together with the change in weight, length, BMI from birth, and weight gain trajectories using latent class growth analysis.

resultsAt 2 years, there was a trend towards lower mean BMI among intervention offspring (adjusted mean difference [aMD] - 0.14 SD [95% CI 0.30, 0.02], p = 0.09), and fewer had a BMI > 95th percentile (i.e. > 1.65 SD, 9.2% vs 18.0%, adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 0.51 [95% CI 0.31, 0.82], p = 0.006). Longitudinal data revealed that intervention offspring had a 24% reduced risk of experiencing rapid weight gain > 0.67 SD in the first year of life (21.9% vs 31.1%, aRR 0.76 [95% CI 0.58, 1.00], p = 0.047). The risk was likewise decreased for sustained weight gain > 1.34 SD in the first 2 years of life (7.7% vs 17.1%, aRR 0.55 [95% CI 0.34, 0.88], p = 0.014). From five weight gain trajectories identified, there were more intervention offspring in the "normal" weight gain trajectory characterised by stable weight SDS around 0 SD from birth to 2 years (38.8% vs 30.1%, RR 1.29 [95% CI 1.03, 1.62], p = 0.029).

conclusionsSupplementation with myo-inositol, probiotics, and additional micronutrients preconception and in pregnancy reduced the incidence of rapid weight gain and obesity at 2 years among offspring. Previous reports suggest these effects will likely translate to health benefits, but longer-term follow-up is needed to evaluate this.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02509988 (Universal Trial Number U1111-1171-8056). Registered on 16 July 2015.

Indexed as

Body-Weight TrajectoryProbioticsBody Mass IndexDietary SupplementsFemaleHumansInositolMicronutrientsPregnancyWeight GainInositolMicronutrientsInfant weight gainNutritional supplementationPreconceptionPregnancyRandomised trial

Identifiers

PMID38287349
PMCPMC10826220
OpenAlexW4391329530

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.