ArticleBMJ open quality2024
Time is a terrible thing to waste: optimising use of intraoperative monitoring practitioner time towards maximising in-house IOM service provision and reducing spend on external provision.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficiency and safety gains from bedside electronic transfusion checks in four hospitals in England.British journal of haematology · 2026Observational
- Optimising the breast radiotherapy planning pathway: a quality improvement project at a regional cancer centre.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Article
- Enhancing heart valve disease surveillance: a quality improvement project demonstrating cost-effective triaging and Clinical Scientist-led services to improve patient care.Echo research and practice · 2025Article
- Quality improvement project to reduce beta-D-glucan turnaround times in an NHS pathology network.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- Reducing laboratory delays in blood culture pathogen identification: a quality improvement project.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intraoperative monitoring (IOM) during orthopaedic and neurosurgical operations informs surgeons about the integrity of patients' central and peripheral nervous systems. It is provided by IOM practitioners (IOMPs), who are usually neurophysiology healthcare scientists. Increasing awareness of the benefits for patient safety and surgical outcomes, along with post-COVID-19 service recovery, has resulted in a material increase in demand for IOM provision nationally, and particularly at Salford Royal Hospital (SRH), which is a regional specialist neurosciences centre.There is a shortage of IOMPs in the UK National Health Service (NHS). At SRH, this is exacerbated by staff capacity shortage, requiring £202 800 of supplementary private provision in 2022.At SRH, IOMPs work in pairs. Our productive time is wasted by delays to surgical starts beyond our control and by paired working for much of a surgery session. This quality improvement (QI) project set out to release productive time by: calling the second IOMP to theatre only shortly before start time, the other IOMP returning to the office during significant delays, releasing an IOMP from theatre when appropriate and providing a laptop in theatre for other work.We tested and refined these change ideas over two plan-do-study-act improvement cycles. Compared with complete paired working, we increased the time available for additional productive work and breaks from an average of 102 to 314 min per operating day, not quite achieving our project target of 360 min.The new ways of working we developed are a step towards ability (when staff capacity increases) to test supporting two (simultaneous) operations with three IOMPs (rather than two pairs of IOMPs). Having significantly improved the use of staff time, we then also used our QI project data to make a successful business case for investment in two further IOMP posts with a predicted net saving of £20 000 per year along with other associated benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.