Evidence mapPaperPMID 38300694Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2024

Digitally Delivered Interventions to Improve Nutrition Behaviors Among Resource-Poor and Ethnic Minority Groups With Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review.

Nazgol Karimi, Rachelle Opie, David Crawford, Stella O'Connell, Kylie Ball

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Digital Health Technology in Diabetes Management in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Narrative Review of the Current Scenario and Future Outlook.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2025
    Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nazgol Karimi *Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5923-6622
Rachelle OpieInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3816-0670
David CrawfordInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2467-7556
Stella O'ConnellInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4611-4065
Kylie BallInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2893-8415
Deakin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResource-poor individuals, such as those with a low income, are disproportionately affected by diabetes and unhealthy eating patterns that contribute to poor disease self-management and prognosis. Digitally delivered interventions have the potential to address some of the barriers to healthy eating experienced by this group. However, little is known about their effectiveness in disadvantaged populations.

objectiveThis systematic review is conducted to assess the effectiveness of digitally delivered interventions in improving nutritional behaviors and nutrition-related health outcomes among disadvantaged people with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

methodsMEDLINE complete, Global Health, Embase, CINAHL complete, Informit Health, IEEE Xplore, and Applied Science and Technology Source databases were searched for studies published between 1990 and 2022 on digitally delivered nutrition interventions for disadvantaged people with T2D. Two reviewers independently assessed the studies for eligibility and determined the study quality using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Assessment Tool. The Behavioral Change Technique Taxonomy V1 was used to identify behavior change techniques used in the design of interventions.

resultsOf the 2434 identified records, 10 (0.4%), comprising 947 participants, met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. A total of 2 digital platforms, web and messaging services (eg, SMS text messaging interventions or multimedia messaging service), were used to deliver interventions. Substantial improvements in dietary behaviors were reported in 5 (50%) of the 10 studies, representing improvements in healthier food choices or increases in dietary knowledge and skills or self-efficacy. Of the 10 studies, 7 (70%) examined changes in blood glucose levels, of which 4 (57%) out of 7 achieved significant decreases in hemoglobin A

conclusionsThis review provided some support for the efficacy of digitally delivered interventions in improving healthy eating behaviors in disadvantaged people with T2D, an essential dietary prerequisite for changes in clinical metabolic parameters. Further research is needed into how disadvantaged people with T2D may benefit more from digital approaches and to identify the specific features of effective digital interventions for supporting healthy behaviors among disadvantaged populations.

trial registrationPROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020149844; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=149844.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Minority GroupsNutritional StatusDigital HealthEthnic and Racial MinoritiesEthnicityHealth BehaviorHumansSystematic Reviews as Topicdigitally deliveredeHealthmobile phonenutritionsocioeconomically disadvantagedtype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID38300694
PMCPMC10870209
OpenAlexW4385400827

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.