Evidence mapPaperPMID 38301682Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Rheumatology2024

Mycophenolate mofetil withdrawal in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Eliza F Chakravarty, Tammy Utset, Diane L Kamen, Gabriel Contreras, W Joseph McCune, Cynthia Aranow, Kenneth Kalunian, Elena Massarotti, Megan E B Clowse, Brad H Rovin and 17 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Rheumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01946880 (An Investigator-Initiated, Phase II, Randomized, Withdrawal Study of Mycophenolate Mofetil), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01946880 phase2terminatednot on this map

An Investigator-Initiated, Phase II, Randomized, Withdrawal Study of Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) in Patients With Stable, Quiescent Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)Ran2013 to 2019Enrolled102ConditionsSystemic Lupus Erythematosus, SLEArmsMycophenolate Mofetil, Hydroxychloroquine or Chloroquine, Prednisone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Lupus Nephritis from Pathogenesis to New Therapies: An Update.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

Eliza F ChakravartyArthritis and Clinical Immunology, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Tammy UtsetDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Diane L KamenDepartment of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Gabriel ContrerasDepartment of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
W Joseph McCuneDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Cynthia AranowAutoimmune and Musculoskeletal Disease, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Kenneth KalunianDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Elena MassarottiDivision of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Megan E B ClowseDivision of Rheumatology and Immunology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Brad H RovinDivision of Nephrology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
S Sam LimSchool of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Vikas MajithiaDivision of Rheumatology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.
Maria Dall'EraDivision of Rheumatology, Russell/Engleman Rheumatology Research Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
R John LooneyAllergy Immunology Rheumatology Division, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
Doruk ErkanBarbara Volcker Center for Women and Rheumatic Diseases, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Amit SaxenaDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Nancy J OlsenDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Kichul KoDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Joel M GuthridgeArthritis and Clinical Immunology, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, USA; Departments of Medicine and Pathology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Ellen GoldmuntzDivision of Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation, NIH/NIAID, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jessica SpringerDivision of Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation, NIH/NIAID, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Carla D'AvetaRho Federal Systems Division, Durham, NC, USA.
Lynette Keyes-ElsteinRho Federal Systems Division, Durham, NC, USA.
Bill BarryRho Federal Systems Division, Durham, NC, USA.
Ashley PinckneyRho Federal Systems Division, Durham, NC, USA.
James McNamaraDivision of Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation, NIH/NIAID, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Judith A JamesArthritis and Clinical Immunology, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, USA; Departments of Medicine and Pathology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA. Electronic address: jamesj@omrf.org.
Rho (United States) · USNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USOklahoma Medical Research Foundation · USUniversity of Chicago · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USDuke University · USEmory University · USFeinstein Institute for Medical Research · USHospital for Special Surgery · USMedical University of South Carolina · USNational Institutes of Health · USNew York University · USPennsylvania State University · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

Autoimmune Drivers and Protectors Team Science (ADAPTS)U01AI176244 · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · 2025 to 2025
$1.2M
Oklahoma ACE: Molecular Destruction of Autoimmune Disease to Aid Clinical Trail SuccessUM1AI144292 · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · 2025 to 2025
$1.2M
Oklahoma Rheumatic Disease Research Cores CenterP30AR073750 · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · 2025 to 2025
$767k
NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272200900057CNIAID NIH HHS U01 AI176244NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI082714NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI110494NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI144292NIAID NIH HHS UM2 AI117870NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR073750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMycophenolate mofetil is an immunosuppressant commonly used to treat systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis. It is a known teratogen associated with significant toxicities, including an increased risk of infections and malignancies. Mycophenolate mofetil withdrawal is desirable once disease quiescence is reached, but the timing of when to do so and whether it provides a benefit has not been well-studied. We aimed to determine the effects of mycophenolate mofetil withdrawal on the risk of clinically significant disease reactivation in patients with quiescent SLE on long-term mycophenolate mofetil therapy.

methodsThis multicenter, open-label, randomised trial was conducted in 19 centres in the USA. Eligible patients were aged between 18 and 70 years old, met the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1997 SLE criteria, and had a clinical SLEDAI score of less than 4 at screening. Mycophenolate mofetil therapy was required to be stable or decreasing for 2 years or more if initiated for renal indications, or for 1 year or more for non-renal indications. Participants were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to a withdrawal group, who tapered off mycophenolate mofetil over 12 weeks, or a maintenance group who maintained their baseline dose (1-3g per day) for 60 weeks. Adaptive random allocation ensured groups were balanced for study site, renal versus non-renal disease, and baseline mycophenolate mofetil dose (≥2 g per day vs <2 g per day). Clinically significant disease reactivation by week 60 following random allocation, requiring increased doses or new immunosuppressive therapy was the primary endpoint, in the modified intention-to-treat population (all randomly allocated participants who began study-provided mycophenolate mofetil). Non-inferiority was evaluated using an estimation-based approach. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01946880) and is completed.

findingsBetween Nov 6, 2013, and April 27, 2018, 123 participants were screened, of whom 102 were randomly allocated to the maintenance group (n=50) or the withdrawal group (n=52). Of the 100 participants included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (49 maintenance, 51 withdrawal), 84 (84%) were women, 16 (16%) were men, 40 (40%) were White, 41 (41%) were Black, and 76 (76%) had a history of lupus nephritis. The average age was 42 (SD 12·7). By week 60, nine (18%) of 51 participants in the withdrawal group had clinically significant disease reactivation, compared to five (10%) of 49 participants in the maintenance group. The risk of clinically significant disease reactivation was 11% (95% CI 5-24) in the maintenance group and 18% (10-32) in the withdrawal group. The estimated increase in the risk of clinically significant disease reactivation with mycophenolate mofetil withdrawal was 7% (one-sided upper 85% confidence limit 15%). Similar rates of adverse events were observed in the maintenance group (45 [90%] of 50 participants) and the withdrawal group (46 [88%] of 52 participants). Infections were more frequent in the mycophenolate mofetil maintenance group (32 [64%]) compared with the withdrawal group (24 [46%]). INTERPRETATIONS: Mycophenolate mofetil withdrawal is not significantly inferior to mycophenolate mofetil maintenance. Estimates for the rates of disease reactivation and increases in risk with withdrawal can assist clinicians in making informed decisions on withdrawing mycophenolate mofetil in patients with stable SLE.

fundingThe National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases.

Indexed as

Lupus Erythematosus, SystemicLupus NephritisAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMiddle AgedMycophenolic AcidTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultImmunosuppressive AgentsMycophenolic Acid

Identifiers

PMID38301682
PMCPMC10922882
OpenAlexW4391329152

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.