ArticleZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2025
Enhanced direct joint attenuation and scatter correction of whole-body PET images via context-aware deep networks.
Article in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep Learning-based Non-rigid Image Registration for High-dose Rate Brachytherapy in Inter-fraction Cervical Cancer.Journal of digital imaging · 2023Trial
- Multi-site distributed training with data protections for PET-based synthetic CT.EJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- The Emerging Role of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Care: From Imaging to Predictive Analytics.Heart views : the official journal of the Gulf Heart Association · 2026Review
- Article
- Artificial intelligence-based joint attenuation and scatter correction strategies for multi-tracer total-body PET.EJNMMI physics · 2024Article
- Decentralized collaborative multi-institutional PET attenuation and scatter correction using federated deep learning.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In positron emission tomography (PET), attenuation and scatter corrections are necessary steps toward accurate quantitative reconstruction of the radiopharmaceutical distribution. Inspired by recent advances in deep learning, many algorithms based on convolutional neural networks have been proposed for automatic attenuation and scatter correction, enabling applications to CT-less or MR-less PET scanners to improve performance in the presence of CT-related artifacts. A known characteristic of PET imaging is to have varying tracer uptakes for various patients and/or anatomical regions. However, existing deep learning-based algorithms utilize a fixed model across different subjects and/or anatomical regions during inference, which could result in spurious outputs. In this work, we present a novel deep learning-based framework for the direct reconstruction of attenuation and scatter-corrected PET from non-attenuation-corrected images in the absence of structural information in the inference. To deal with inter-subject and intra-subject uptake variations in PET imaging, we propose a novel model to perform subject- and region-specific filtering through modulating the convolution kernels in accordance to the contextual coherency within the neighboring slices. This way, the context-aware convolution can guide the composition of intermediate features in favor of regressing input-conditioned and/or region-specific tracer uptakes. We also utilized a large cohort of 910 whole-body studies for training and evaluation purposes, which is more than one order of magnitude larger than previous works. In our experimental studies, qualitative assessments showed that our proposed CT-free method is capable of producing corrected PET images that accurately resemble ground truth images corrected with the aid of CT scans. For quantitative assessments, we evaluated our proposed method over 112 held-out subjects and achieved an absolute relative error of 14.30±3.88% and a relative error of -2.11%±2.73% in whole-body.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.