ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2024
Tissue engineering strategies for breast reconstruction: a literature review of current advances and future directions.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Creating Engineered NAC Flaps Using in Vivo Revascularization: A Proof-Of-Concept Study.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Article
- The Effects of Ovine-Derived Reinforced Tissue Matrix Surrounding Silicone-Based Implants in a Rat Prepectoral Reconstruction Model.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Investigating the foreign body response and regenerative mechanisms in medical-grade polycaprolactone scaffold guided breast reconstruction in a porcine model.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Enhancing Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction Using the Serratus Anterior Fascia: The Hybrid Plane.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Comprehensive overview of management and risk assessment of breast cancer-related lymphedema: a multidisciplinary approach.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Mesh-free prepectoral breast reconstruction: a safe and effective alternative.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Engineering the Future of Stem Cells in Vascular Reconstruction: A Leap Towards Functional Endothelialized Tissue-Engineered Vascular Conduits.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2025Article
- Toward Sex-Specific Biomaterials Innovation: A Perspective.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Review
- Review
- Maximizing the Longevity and Volume Retention of Fat Grafts: Advances in Clinical Practice.Cureus · 2025Review
- Preclinical Volume Retention of Fat Grafts Processed with REVOLVE™ Technology or Decantation Methods in Irradiated and Nonirradiated Wounds.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Immune-privileged cord blood-derived endothelial colony-forming cells: advancing immunomodulation and vascular regeneration.Angiogenesis · 2025Review
- Innovations in Nipple-areolar Complex Reconstruction: Evaluation of a New Prosthesis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Conceptualizing Scaffold Guided Breast Tissue Regeneration in a Preclinical Large Animal Model.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Comparison of outcomes following prepectoral and subpectoral implants for breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Objective: Mastectomy is a primary treatment for breast cancer patients, and both autologous and implant-based reconstructive techniques have shown excellent results. In recent years, advancements in bioengineering have led to a proliferation of innovative approaches to breast reconstruction. This article comprehensively explores the promising perspectives offered by bioengineering and tissue engineering in the field of breast reconstruction. Methods: A literature review was conducted between April and June 2023 on PubMed and Google Scholar Databases. All English and French articles related to bioengineering applied to the field of breast reconstruction were included. We used the Evidence-Based Veterinary Medicine Association (EBVM) Toolkit 14 checklist for narrative reviews as a quality assurance measure and the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA) tool to self-assess our methodology. Key Content and Findings: Over 130 references related to breast bioengineering were included. The analysis revealed four key applications: enhancing the quality of the skin envelope, improving the viability of fat grafting, creating breast shape and volume via bio-printing, and optimizing nipple reconstruction through engineering techniques. The primary identified approaches revolved around establishing structural support and enhancing cellular viability. Structural techniques predominantly involved the implementation of 3D printed, decellularized, or biocompatible material scaffolds. Meanwhile, promoting cellular content trophicity primarily focused on harnessing the regenerative potential of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) and increasing the tissue's survivability and cell trophicity. Conclusions: Tissue and bioengineering hold immense promise in the field of breast reconstruction, offering a diverse array of approaches. By combining existing techniques with novel advancements, they have the potential to significantly enhance the therapeutic options available to plastic and reconstructive surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.