ReviewUpdates in surgery2024
Progress in the study of mechanisms and pathways related to the survival of random skin flaps.
Review in Updates in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tissue perfusion and its influencing factors in epigastrial adipocutanous flaps affected by ischemia-reperfusion in rats.Acta cirurgica brasileira · 2026Article
- Does Breast Implant Size Larger Than Mastectomy Specimen Size Increase the Risk of Flap Necrosis?Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Article
- Impacts of PACAP 1-38 and BGP-15 on the Healing of Fasciocutaneous Groin Flaps Affected by Ischemia-Reperfusion in Rats.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Research progress on quercetin in improving the survival rate of random skin flap.Archives of dermatological research · 2025Review
- Monitoring lymphatic reconstitution in free latissimus dorsi flap for lower extremity defects repair in pediatric patients: a case series.Translational pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The clinical application of random flaps in wound repair has been a topic of discussion. Random flaps are prone to necrosis due to the lack of well-defined vascular blood supply during transfer surgery. Their clinical utility is restricted, financial and psychological burdens is imposed on patients due to this limitation. The survival of random skin flaps depends on factors such as ischemia-reperfusion injury, oxidative stress, local inflammatory response, and neovascularization. This review aims to provide an overview of the evidence supporting the use of random flaps in clinical practice. In addition, this review explores the impact of different medications on signaling pathways within the flap's local microcirculation and investigates the interconnections between these pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38308185What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.