Evidence mapPaperPMID 38308265Full record

Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

Physical activity, gestational weight gain in obese patients with early gestational diabetes and the perinatal outcome - a randomised-controlled trial.

Lukasz Adamczak, Urszula Mantaj, Rafał Sibiak, Paweł Gutaj, Ewa Wender-Ozegowska

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Serum Amino Acid Variations in Obesity and Gestational Diabetes During Pregnancy.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lukasz Adamczak *Department of Reproduction, Chair of Fetomaternal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland. lukaszadamczak91@gmail.com.
Urszula Mantaj *Department of Reproduction, Chair of Fetomaternal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Rafał SibiakDepartment of Reproduction, Chair of Fetomaternal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Paweł GutajDepartment of Reproduction, Chair of Fetomaternal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Ewa Wender-OzegowskaDepartment of Reproduction, Chair of Fetomaternal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExcessive gestational weight gain, especially among women with gestational diabetes, is associated with several adverse perinatal outcomes. Our study aimed to analyse the impact of the use of pedometers to supervise physical activity on maternal health and the obstetric outcomes of pregnant women with obesity and early gestational diabetes.

methods124 pregnant patients were enrolled in the presented research. INCLUSION CRITERIA: singleton pregnancy, age > 18 years, gestational diabetes diagnosed in the first half of pregnancy (< 20th week of pregnancy), obesity according to the American Endocrine Society criteria. Each patient was advised to take at least 5000 steps daily. Patients were randomly assigned to pedometers (N = 62), and were recommended to monitor daily the number of steps. The group without pedometers (N = 62) was not observed. Visit (V1) was scheduled between the 28th and 32nd gestational week (GW), and visit (V2) occurred between the 37th and 39th GW. Anthropometric measurements and blood samples were collected from all patients at each appointment. Foetal and maternal outcomes were analysed at the end of the study.

resultsIn the group supervised by pedometers, there were significantly fewer newborns with macrosomia (p = 0,03). Only 45% of patients satisfied the recommended physical activity guidelines. Patients who walked more than 5000 steps per day had significantly higher body weight at baseline (p = 0,005), but weight gain was significantly lower than in the group that did not exceed 5000 steps per day (p < 0,001). The perinatal outcome in the group of patients performing more than 5000 steps did not demonstrate significant differences with when compared to less active group. ROC curve for weight gain above the guidelines indicated a statistically substantial cut-off point for this group at the level of 4210 steps/day (p = 0.00001).

conclusionsMonitoring the activity of pregnant patients with gestational diabetes and obesity by pedometers did not have a significantly impact on their metabolic control and weight gain. However, it contributed to less macrosomia. Furthermore, physical activity over 5,000 steps per day positively affects weight loss, as well as contributes to improved obstetric and neonatal outcomes.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalGestational Weight GainAdultBody Mass IndexExerciseFemaleFetal MacrosomiaHumansInfant, NewbornObesityPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeWeight GainGestational diabetes mellitusObesityPhysical activityPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID38308265
PMCPMC10836025
OpenAlexW4391474207

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.