ArticleThe world journal of men's health2024
Associations between Erectile Dysfunction and Vascular Parameters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in The world journal of men's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- SIEDY Diagnostic Accuracy in Assessing Erectile Dysfunction in Young Men Living With HIV.Andrology · 2026Article
- Photoplethysmography-Derived Flow-Mediated Dilation as a Non-Invasive Marker of Endothelial Function in Erectile Dysfunction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Investigating the impact of ALI on erectile dysfunction in American men: a cross-sectional study using NHANES data.Sexual medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Combined Zinc and Metformin Attenuated Impairment of Corpus Cavernosum Function, Imbalance of Zinc Homeostasis, Apoptosis, and Fibrosis in STZ-Induced Diabetic Mice by Inhibiting the TGF-β1/Smad3 Pathway.Biological trace element research · 2026Article
- Association of erectile dysfunction and peripheral arterial disease in NHANES 2001-2004: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeErectile dysfunction (ED) is associated with several vascular disorders, but the associations between ED and vascular parameters are still unclear. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe analyzed and synthesized a comprehensive range of studies from PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus regarding the associations between ED and the following measures: ankle-brachial index (ABI), pulse wave velocity (PWV), intima-media thickness (IMT), nitrate-mediated dilation (NMD), flow-mediated dilation (FMD), augmentation index (AI), endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and other vascular parameters. Subgroup analysis was conducted according to specific types of parameters. Study quality was assessed by using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to confirm the robustness of the pooled results.
resultsFifty-seven studies with 7,312 individuals were included. Twenty-eight studies were considered to be high-quality. ED patients had a 0.11 mm higher IMT (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.07, 0.15), a 2.86% lower FMD (95% CI: -3.56, -2.17), a 2.34% lower NMD (95% CI: -3.37, -1.31), a 2.83% higher AI (95% CI: 0.02, 5.63), a 1.11 m/s higher PWV (95% CI: 0.01, 2.21), and a 0.72% lower percentage of EPCs (95% CI: -1.19, -0.24) compared to those without ED. However, ABI was similar between ED patients and non-ED individuals. According to sensitivity analysis, the pooled results were robust.
conclusionsOur study confirmed the associations between ED and several vascular parameters and highlighted the importance of prevention and management of vascular and endothelial dysfunction in ED patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.