ArticleHeliyon2024
Construction of immune-related molecular diagnostic and predictive models of hepatocellular carcinoma based on machine learning.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A GIMAP family signature for prognostic prediction and immune characterization in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- KIF4A in disease pathogenesis and therapeutics: from molecular mechanisms to clinical translation.Biology direct · 2025Review
- Identification of biomarkers related toHeliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To exploit hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnostic substances, we identify potential predictive markers based on machine learning and to explore the significance of immune cell infiltration in this pathology. Method: Three HCC gene expression datasets were used for weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and differential expression analysis. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) and Random Forest were applied to identify candidate biomarkers. The diagnostic value of HCC diagnostic gene biomarkers was further assessed by the area under the ROC curve observed in the validation dataset. CIBERSORT was used to analyze 22 immune cell fractions from HCC patients and to analyze their correlation with diagnostic markers. In addition, the prognostic value of the markers and the sensitivity of the drugs were analyzed. Result: WGCNA and differential expression analysis were used to screen 396 distinct gene signatures in HCC tissues. They were mostly engaged in cytoplasmic fusion and the cell division cycle, according to gene enrichment analyses. Five genes were shown to have a high diagnostic value for use as diagnostic biomarkers for HCC, including EFHD1 (AUC = 0.77), KIF4A (AUC = 0.97), UBE2C (AUC = 0.96), SMYD3 (AUC = 0.91), and MCM7 (AUC = 0.93). T cells, NK cells, macrophages, and dendritic cells were found to be related to diagnostic markers in HCC tissues by immune cell infiltration analysis, indicating that these cells are intimately linked to the onset and spread of HCC. Concurrently, these five genes and their constructed models have considerable prognostic value. Conclusion: These five genes (EFHD1, KIF4A, UBE2C, SMYD3, and MCM7) may serve as new candidate molecular markers for HCC, providing new insights for future diagnosis, prognosis, and molecular therapy of HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.